organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

L-Talitol

crossmark logo

aGraduate School of Science for Creative Emergence, Kagawa University, 2217-20 Hayashi-cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by L. Van Meervelt, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (Received 13 August 2026; accepted 20 August 2026; online 25 August 2026)

The title compound, C6H14O6, the sugar alcohol corresponding to L-talose, was crystallized from aqueous solution. Colourless block-shaped single crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained. The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21, with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. In the crystal, all six hy­droxy groups act as donors in O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network. The crystal structure of its enanti­omer, D-altritol (D-talitol), has been reported previously [Kopf et al. (1991View full citation). Carbohydr. Res. 217, 1–6].

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

L-Talitol is the sugar alcohol corresponding to the rare sugar L-talose. Systematic bioproduction strategies have expanded the availability of rare hexoses and their corresponding sugar alcohols (Izumori, 2002View full citation). Sugar alcohols possess multiple hy­droxy groups and can therefore form extensive inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding networks. Elucidation of their mol­ecular conformations and crystal packing is important for understanding their solid-state properties.

The crystal structure of the enanti­omer, D-altritol (D-talitol), was reported previously by Kopf et al. (1991View full citation; CSD refcode JOJZOX). The present study provides a modern single-crystal structure determination of the corresponding L enanti­omer using Cu Kα radiation. Compared with the earlier determination, for which a conventional R value of 0.054 was reported, the present refinement gives a lower value of R1 = 0.0292 and unit-cell parameters with smaller standard uncertainties. Furthermore, the anomalous-scattering data permitted assessment of the assigned absolute configuration, giving a Flack parameter of 0.07 (16) based on 570 quotients. The present determination therefore provides direct crystallographic characterization of L-talitol and a more precise modern dataset for this enanti­omorphic pair.

The title compound, C6H14O6 (Fig. 1[link]), adopts an acyclic six-carbon chain structure. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that it crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21. The asymmetric unit contains one mol­ecule of L-talitol.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Mol­ecular structure of L-talitol, showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level, and hydrogen atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radii.

In the crystal, all six hy­droxy groups act as hydrogen-bond donors (Table 1[link]), all of which are intermolecular interactions. These inter­actions link the mol­ecules in all three crystallographic directions, producing a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network, as illustrated in Fig. 2[link].

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O1i 0.82 2.28 2.9570 (18) 140
O2—H2⋯O4ii 0.82 1.99 2.747 (2) 154
O3—H3⋯O2iii 0.82 1.88 2.700 (2) 174
O4—H4⋯O5iv 0.82 1.89 2.7027 (19) 174
O5—H5⋯O3v 0.82 2.05 2.773 (2) 147
O6—H6⋯O6vi 0.82 2.16 2.9502 (19) 162
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation; (vi) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal packing of L-talitol, showing part of the three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network, with the unit-cell directions indicated. The cyan dashed lines indicate the O⋯O contacts associated with the O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The central mol­ecule is shown using a ball-and-stick representation, whereas the surrounding mol­ecules are shown using a capped-stick representation.

Synthesis and crystallization

Commercially available L-talitol [Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (TCI)] was used as received without further purification. The sample was dissolved in water, and the solution was allowed to evaporate slowly at room temperature. Colorless block-shaped single crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. The absolute configuration was assigned on the basis of the known configuration of the commercially available L-talitol sample and was further supported by the refined Flack parameter. The Flack parameter was 0.07 (16), determined using 570 quotients of the type [(I+) − (I)]/[(I+) + (I)] (Parsons et al., 2013View full citation).

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C6H14O6
Mr 182.17
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21
Temperature (K) 296
a, b, c (Å) 4.8901 (3), 5.1671 (3), 16.3657 (10)
β (°) 100.136 (4)
V3) 407.07 (4)
Z 2
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.17
Crystal size (mm) 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.10
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
Absorption correction Multi-scan (ABSCOR; Rigaku, 1995View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.711, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 4278, 1446, 1399
Rint 0.059
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.602
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.075, 1.08
No. of reflections 1446
No. of parameters 116
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.20, −0.12
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 570 quotients [(I+)−(I)]/[(I+)+(I)] (Parsons et al., 2013View full citation)
Absolute structure parameter 0.07 (16)
Computer programs: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 2009View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 1.3 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

L-Talitol top
Crystal data top
C6H14O6F(000) = 196
Mr = 182.17Dx = 1.486 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54187 Å
a = 4.8901 (3) ÅCell parameters from 1932 reflections
b = 5.1671 (3) Åθ = 5.5–68.2°
c = 16.3657 (10) ŵ = 1.17 mm1
β = 100.136 (4)°T = 296 K
V = 407.07 (4) Å3Block, clear light colourless
Z = 20.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID
diffractometer
1399 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω scansRint = 0.059
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(ABSCOR; Rigaku, 1995)
θmax = 68.2°, θmin = 5.5°
Tmin = 0.711, Tmax = 1.000h = 55
4278 measured reflectionsk = 66
1446 independent reflectionsl = 1919
Refinement top
Refinement on F2H-atom parameters constrained
Least-squares matrix: full w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0295P)2 + 0.0407P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.075Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
S = 1.08Δρmin = 0.12 e Å3
1446 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL-2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
116 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.027 (4)
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 570 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: dualAbsolute structure parameter: 0.07 (16)
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydroxy H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and treated as rotating groups, with O—H = 0.82 Å. C-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using riding models, with C—H = 0.98 Å for CH groups and 0.97 Å for CH2 groups. For all H atoms, Uiso(H) was constrained to 1.2Ueq of the parent C or O atom.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.1487 (4)0.2244 (3)0.00353 (9)0.0387 (5)
H10.0498950.3347010.0229400.046*
O20.2665 (3)0.0647 (3)0.14835 (9)0.0251 (4)
H20.3517070.1788600.1769560.030*
O30.8391 (3)0.0087 (3)0.23126 (9)0.0287 (4)
H30.9603880.0232510.2027490.034*
O40.3808 (3)0.5215 (3)0.25422 (8)0.0260 (4)
H40.2560580.5310700.2816370.031*
O50.9447 (3)0.5638 (3)0.33441 (9)0.0277 (4)
H50.8492840.6766890.3080920.033*
O60.8543 (4)0.4580 (4)0.49996 (9)0.0400 (5)
H60.9391240.3220890.5112320.048*
C10.2905 (5)0.3341 (5)0.07904 (12)0.0268 (5)
H1A0.1582450.4041130.1109570.032*
H1B0.4118510.4728570.0675100.032*
C20.4582 (4)0.1203 (4)0.12684 (12)0.0223 (5)
H2A0.5639500.0351650.0888630.027*
C30.6663 (4)0.2077 (4)0.20298 (12)0.0205 (4)
H3A0.7815930.3471560.1867230.025*
C40.5431 (4)0.2952 (4)0.27779 (11)0.0202 (4)
H4A0.4229270.1582570.2930840.024*
C50.7699 (4)0.3574 (4)0.35239 (12)0.0229 (5)
H5A0.8857970.2028330.3649670.027*
C60.6458 (5)0.4218 (6)0.42847 (12)0.0326 (5)
H6A0.5357030.5783910.4180940.039*
H6B0.5231870.2826460.4387950.039*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0476 (11)0.0336 (10)0.0273 (8)0.0020 (9)0.0144 (7)0.0010 (7)
O20.0235 (8)0.0178 (7)0.0326 (8)0.0016 (6)0.0010 (6)0.0039 (6)
O30.0253 (8)0.0309 (9)0.0311 (8)0.0116 (7)0.0082 (6)0.0070 (7)
O40.0250 (8)0.0290 (9)0.0250 (7)0.0096 (7)0.0073 (6)0.0054 (6)
O50.0195 (7)0.0287 (9)0.0336 (8)0.0001 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0071 (7)
O60.0508 (11)0.0401 (10)0.0238 (7)0.0001 (9)0.0080 (7)0.0046 (7)
C10.0335 (12)0.0224 (10)0.0222 (9)0.0014 (10)0.0011 (8)0.0014 (9)
C20.0228 (10)0.0227 (10)0.0217 (9)0.0010 (9)0.0043 (8)0.0004 (8)
C30.0191 (10)0.0203 (10)0.0215 (9)0.0022 (8)0.0015 (8)0.0033 (8)
C40.0198 (10)0.0203 (10)0.0199 (8)0.0028 (8)0.0022 (7)0.0042 (8)
C50.0225 (10)0.0219 (11)0.0227 (9)0.0007 (8)0.0004 (8)0.0028 (8)
C60.0327 (13)0.0417 (13)0.0222 (10)0.0032 (11)0.0018 (9)0.0033 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—H10.8200C1—H1B0.9700
O1—C11.424 (2)C1—C21.510 (3)
O2—H20.8200C2—H2A0.9800
O2—C21.425 (3)C2—C31.532 (3)
O3—H30.8200C3—H3A0.9800
O3—C31.429 (2)C3—C41.525 (3)
O4—H40.8200C4—H4A0.9800
O4—C41.428 (3)C4—C51.532 (2)
O5—H50.8200C5—H5A0.9800
O5—C51.429 (2)C5—C61.515 (3)
O6—H60.8200C6—H6A0.9700
O6—C61.423 (2)C6—H6B0.9700
C1—H1A0.9700
C1—O1—H1109.5C2—C3—H3A109.1
C2—O2—H2109.5C4—C3—C2116.15 (16)
C3—O3—H3109.5C4—C3—H3A109.1
C4—O4—H4109.5O4—C4—C3107.77 (14)
C5—O5—H5109.5O4—C4—H4A109.3
C6—O6—H6109.5O4—C4—C5109.48 (17)
O1—C1—H1A110.3C3—C4—H4A109.3
O1—C1—H1B110.3C3—C4—C5111.66 (15)
O1—C1—C2107.18 (18)C5—C4—H4A109.3
H1A—C1—H1B108.5O5—C5—C4111.58 (16)
C2—C1—H1A110.3O5—C5—H5A107.9
C2—C1—H1B110.3O5—C5—C6110.23 (18)
O2—C2—C1107.33 (17)C4—C5—H5A107.9
O2—C2—H2A107.4C6—C5—C4111.25 (17)
O2—C2—C3111.62 (16)C6—C5—H5A107.9
C1—C2—H2A107.4O6—C6—C5111.83 (19)
C1—C2—C3115.35 (17)O6—C6—H6A109.3
C3—C2—H2A107.4O6—C6—H6B109.3
O3—C3—C2107.65 (16)C5—C6—H6A109.3
O3—C3—H3A109.1C5—C6—H6B109.3
O3—C3—C4105.46 (14)H6A—C6—H6B107.9
O1—C1—C2—O265.3 (2)O5—C5—C6—O660.8 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C3169.64 (19)C1—C2—C3—O3169.67 (16)
O2—C2—C3—O367.5 (2)C1—C2—C3—C472.4 (2)
O2—C2—C3—C450.4 (2)C2—C3—C4—O464.3 (2)
O3—C3—C4—O4176.62 (16)C2—C3—C4—C5175.45 (19)
O3—C3—C4—C556.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—O561.3 (2)
O4—C4—C5—O557.9 (2)C3—C4—C5—C6175.13 (18)
O4—C4—C5—C665.6 (2)C4—C5—C6—O6174.9 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O1i0.822.282.9570 (18)140
O2—H2···O4ii0.821.992.747 (2)154
O3—H3···O2iii0.821.882.700 (2)174
O4—H4···O5iv0.821.892.7027 (19)174
O5—H5···O3v0.822.052.773 (2)147
O6—H6···O6vi0.822.162.9502 (19)162
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z; (ii) x, y1, z; (iii) x+1, y, z; (iv) x1, y, z; (v) x, y+1, z; (vi) x+2, y1/2, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Genta Sakane (Okayama University of Science) for valuable discussions and technical guidance, and Kei Takeshita (FUSHIMI Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) for helpful suggestions. This work was supported by the JST Support for Pioneering Research Initiated by the Next Generation (SPRING) program, Japan.

References

Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationIzumori, K. (2002). Naturwissenschaften 89, 120–124.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKopf, J., Bischoff, M. & Köll, P. (1991). Carbohydr. Res. 217, 1–6.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationParsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku (2009). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146