inorganic compounds
Reinvestigation of the of UF6 by single-crystal X-ray diffraction
aAnorganische Chemie, Fluorchemie, Universität Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Str. 1, 53121 Bonn, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Single-crystals of hexafluoridouranium(VI), UF6, were obtained by sublimation. A re-refinement of the crystal structure using low-temperature (100 K) single-crystal X-ray data was carried out considering all Uij terms of the displacement parameters of the U and F atoms, leading overall to a significantly improved structural model. UF6 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnma with the F atoms forming a double hexagonal closest packing of ABAC stacking with U atoms in one-sixth of the voids. The UF6 molecules deviate only slightly from octahedral point-group symmetry.
Keywords: crystal structure; uranium hexafluoride; double hexagonal packing; actinoid fluoride; redetermination.
CCDC reference: 2580701
Structure description
Uranium hexafluoride is likely the most important material in the nuclear energy sector for isotope enrichment of the fissile isotope 235U. UF6 was probably first synthesized by Henri Moissan (1900
) by reacting fluorine gas with uranium metal. However, at that time he was unable to further characterize the resulting white smoke. Later, Otto Ruff and coworkers succeeded in obtaining UF6 and describing its properties (Ruff, 1909
; Ruff & Heinzelmann, 1911
). Ruff reported shiny, colorless, crystals with monoclinic symmetry without giving further details (Ruff, 1909
). Reports on the crystal structure of UF6 appeared well after the Manhattan Project. The first one, a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of a crystal mounted in a glass capillary (Hoard & Stroupe, 1958
) led to lattice parameters a = 9.900 (2), b = 8.962 (2), c = 5.207 (2) Å, V = 462.0 Å3 at T = 298 K in Pnma (no R values reported). In 1973, the and structure model were confirmed by powder neutron diffraction at 294 K using the previously reported lattice parameters (Taylor et al., 1973
) without giving R values. In 1975, another structural study of UF6 at 193 and 293 K by powder neutron diffraction was carried out (Taylor & Wilson, 1975
), confirming that it has orthorhombic symmetry at both temperatures [a = 9.843 (11), b = 8.920 (10), c = 5.173 (6) Å, V = 454.2 (8) Å3 at T = 193 K, R = Σ(|Io – Ic|)/ΣIo = 0.081; a = 9.924 (10), b = 8.954 (9), c = 5.198 (5) Å, V = 461.9 (8) Å3 at T = 293 K, R = Σ(|Io – Ic|)/ΣIo = 0.133]. Levy et al. (1976
) reported a single-crystal neutron diffraction study at 293 K with a = 9.92 (5), b = 8.97 (5), c = 5.22 (3) Å (V not reported), and gave an R value of 0.041. The latest report refers to a powder neutron diffraction study at 77 K, which led to lattice parameters a = 9.654 (3), b = 8.776 (4), c = 5.084 (3) Å, V = 430.7 (3) Å3 and an R = Σ(|yo – yc|)/Σyo value (yo and yc are the background-corrected pattern intensities) of 0.069 (Levy et al., 1983
).
As all of these structure refinements, with the exception of the single-crystal neutron diffraction study by Levy et al. (1976
), used isotropic displacement parameters for all atoms, we reinvestigated the crystal structure of UF6 based on single-crystal X-ray diffraction data at 100 K. of all Uij terms of the displacement parameters of the U and the four F atoms allowed for a more precise structural model.
The U atom (multiplicity 4, Wyckoff letter c, site symmetry .m.) is surrounded by six F atoms (F1 to F4) in a slightly distorted octahedral arrangement (Fig. 1
, Table 1
). The F1 and the F2 atoms likewise reside on a mirror plane (4 c, .m.), while the F3 and F4 atoms occupy a general position (8 d, 1). In the previous studies, the U—F bond lengths were reported to range from 1.88 (2) to 2.28 (4) Å with F—U—F angles from 88.0 (17) to 92.9 (17)° (Taylor et al., 1973
), from 1.95 (1) to 2.03 (2) Å at 193 K with angles from 86.4 (7) to 92.2 (6)°, from 1.86 (3) to 1.99 (2) Å with angles from 83.7 (9) to 95.1 (8)° (Taylor & Wilson, 1975
), from 1.992 (3) to 2.004 (4) Å with angles from 89.42 (17) to 90.20 (11)° (Levy et al., 1976
), and as mean bond lengths of 2.023 (6) Å (77 K), 1.983 (6) Å (193 K), and 1.995 (2) Å (293 K) without reporting the bond angles (Levy et al., 1983
). It is interesting to note that the longest bond lengths were observed at the lowest temperature, underlining the need for a redetermination of the crystal structure. The U—F bond lengths determined in the present work are much more uniform, and the F—U—F bond angles are closer to the ideal values of 90 and 180° than determined in previous studies (Table 1
). The deviations of the UF6 molecule from Oh symmetry are thus small; its crystallographically imposed is Cs (m).
|
| Figure 1 UF6 molecule in the solid state. Atoms are shown with anisotropic displacement ellipsoids at the 70% probability level; the symmetry code refers to Table 1 |
The unit-cell parameters determined in this study (Table 2
) are in good agreement with those given above, especially with those determined at 77 K (Levy et al., 1983
) which are a little smaller, as expected.
|
In the a single UF6 molecule is surrounded by twelve others in the shape of a distorted anticuboctahedron if U⋯U distances from 5.0854 (4) to 5.1402 (4) Å are considered. Thus, the U atoms adopt a distorted arrangement similar to the Mg atoms in the Mg structure type. In a more detailed description, the U atoms occupy one-sixth of the octahedral voids of hexagonally close-packed layers of F atoms. The layers are parallel to the bc plane, with a stacking sequence along the a-axis direction of ABAC, representing a double hexagonal packing, hc. The close-packing of F atoms is only slightly distorted, as evidenced by the F⋯F distances. Those within a UF6 molecule range from 2.791 (6) to 2.808 (4) Å, while the intermolecular distances are only slightly larger in the range from 2.900 (6) to 3.119 (6) Å. The of UF6 is shown in Fig. 2
.
| Figure 2 Crystal structure of UF6 viewed along the c axis. Atoms are drawn as spheres with arbitrary radii. The z coordinates of the U atoms are indicated. |
Synthesis and crystallization
UF6 of natural isotope ratio was synthesized according to a literature procedure (Chemnitz et al., 2021
), and single crystals were obtained by slow sublimation at room temperature.
Structural data
CCDC reference: 2580701
contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314626008898/wm4259sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314626008898/wm4259Isup2.hkl
| UF6 | Dx = 5.421 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 352.02 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Orthorhombic, Pnma | Cell parameters from 9312 reflections |
| a = 9.6612 (8) Å | θ = 4.0–32.3° |
| b = 8.7786 (7) Å | µ = 37.66 mm−1 |
| c = 5.0854 (4) Å | T = 100 K |
| V = 431.30 (6) Å3 | Plate, clear colourless |
| Z = 4 | 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm |
| F(000) = 584 |
| Stoe IPDS II diffractometer | 784 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus, X-ray tube | 681 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Planar graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.042 |
| Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 31.9°, θmin = 4.2° |
| rotation method, ω scans | h = −14→13 |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (LANA; Koziskova et al., 2016) | k = −13→13 |
| Tmin = 0.0002, Tmax = 0.001 | l = −7→7 |
| 6472 measured reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
| Least-squares matrix: full | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0372P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| wR(F2) = 0.054 | Δρmax = 2.37 e Å−3 |
| S = 1.03 | Δρmin = −1.68 e Å−3 |
| 784 reflections | Extinction correction: SHELXL-2019/2 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
| 38 parameters | Extinction coefficient: 0.0038 (4) |
| 0 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| U1 | 0.12887 (2) | 0.250000 | 0.42275 (4) | 0.01189 (11) | |
| F1 | 0.0110 (4) | 0.250000 | 0.7420 (8) | 0.0199 (9) | |
| F2 | 0.2469 (4) | 0.250000 | 0.1039 (7) | 0.0167 (8) | |
| F3 | 0.0096 (2) | 0.0910 (3) | 0.2627 (6) | 0.0174 (5) | |
| F4 | 0.2471 (3) | 0.0906 (4) | 0.5800 (5) | 0.0180 (6) |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| U1 | 0.01144 (14) | 0.01073 (13) | 0.01350 (14) | 0.000 | −0.00002 (8) | 0.000 |
| F1 | 0.0201 (17) | 0.022 (2) | 0.018 (2) | 0.000 | 0.0037 (16) | 0.000 |
| F2 | 0.0174 (16) | 0.016 (2) | 0.0164 (18) | 0.000 | 0.0033 (14) | 0.000 |
| F3 | 0.0180 (11) | 0.0131 (14) | 0.0212 (13) | −0.0024 (11) | −0.0012 (11) | −0.0027 (11) |
| F4 | 0.0177 (11) | 0.0158 (15) | 0.0206 (14) | 0.0025 (11) | −0.0004 (10) | −0.0010 (12) |
| U1—U1i | 5.1402 (4) | U1—F3 | 1.984 (3) |
| U1—U1ii | 5.1072 (4) | U1—F3iv | 1.984 (3) |
| U1—U1iii | 5.0854 (4) | U1—F4 | 1.975 (3) |
| U1—F1 | 1.983 (4) | U1—F4iv | 1.975 (3) |
| U1—F2 | 1.982 (4) | ||
| F1—U1—F3iv | 90.12 (11) | F4iv—U1—F2 | 89.92 (11) |
| F1—U1—F3 | 90.12 (11) | F4—U1—F2 | 89.92 (11) |
| F2—U1—F1 | 179.95 (14) | F4—U1—F3 | 90.20 (13) |
| F2—U1—F3 | 89.91 (11) | F4iv—U1—F3iv | 90.20 (13) |
| F2—U1—F3iv | 89.91 (11) | F4iv—U1—F3 | 179.56 (11) |
| F3iv—U1—F3 | 89.39 (17) | F4—U1—F3iv | 179.56 (11) |
| F4iv—U1—F1 | 90.05 (11) | F4iv—U1—F4 | 90.21 (18) |
| F4—U1—F1 | 90.05 (11) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) x, y, z+1; (iv) x, −y+1/2, z. |
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Sergei Ivlev, Philipps-Universität Marburg, for his support with the X-ray diffraction measurements.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant No. KR3595/10-1).
References
Brandenburg, K. (2022). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Chemnitz, T., Buchner, M. R., Petry, W. & Kraus, F. (2021). J. Fluor. Chem. 249, 109862. CrossRef Google Scholar
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Folkers-Karlsson, L. C., Celani, P., Hahn, F. & Richter, J. (2026). Z. Kristallogr. 241, 41–51. CAS Google Scholar
Hoard, J. L. & Stroupe, J. D. (1958). Chemistry of Uranium, U. S. A. E. C. Rep. TID-5290, Pap. 45, 325–350. Google Scholar
Koziskova, J., Hahn, F., Richter, J. & Kožíšek, J. (2016). Acta Chim. Slovaca 9, 136–140. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Levy, J. H., Taylor, J. C. & Waugh, A. B. (1983). J. Fluor. Chem. 23, 29–36. CrossRef Google Scholar
Levy, J. H., Taylor, J. C. & Wilson, P. W. (1976). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 219–224. CrossRef Google Scholar
Moissan, H. (1900). Le fluor et ses composés. G. Steinheil: Paris. Google Scholar
Ruff, O. (1909). Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 42, 492–497. CrossRef Google Scholar
Ruff, O. & Heinzelmann, A. (1911). Z. Anorg. Chem. 72, 63–84. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Taylor, J. C. & Wilson, P. W. (1975). J. Solid State Chem. 14, 378–382. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, J. C., Wilson, P. W. & Kelly, J. W. (1973). Acta Cryst. B29, 7–12. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

menu
access