organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

2-[(3-Chloro-2-methyl­phen­yl)amino]­quinoline-3-carb­­oxy­lic acid

crossmark logo

aSchool of Chemical Engineering and Pharmacy, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430205, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by I. Brito, University of Antofagasta, Chile (Received 27 May 2026; accepted 29 May 2026; online 2 June 2026)

The title compound, C17H13ClN2O2, is an analogue of fenamic acid-type non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. It was prepared from 2-chloro­quinoline-3-carb­oxy­lic acid and 3-chloro-2-methyl­aniline via palladium-catalysed Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling to afford the methyl ester inter­mediate, followed by alkaline hydrolysis. The mol­ecule adopts a nearly planar conformation with a dihedral angle of 7.17 (5)° between the quinoline ring system and the substituted phenyl ring. Adjacent mol­ecules form centrosymmetric carb­oxy­lic acid dimers via pairwise O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are mainstream clinical medicines with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and anti­pyretic activities. Fenamate-type di­aryl­amine derivatives serve as important lead scaffolds for anti-inflammatory drug discovery (Luan et al. 2017View full citation). However, traditional fenamate mol­ecules suffer from high conformational flexibility and disordered crystal packing, resulting in poor polymorphic stability and unstable pharmacological performance, which limits their clinical application (Uzoh et al. 2012View full citation). Replacing the benzene ring with a quinoline fused-ring moiety may enhance mol­ecular conjugation and planarity, thus optimizing the mol­ecular packing characteristics. To further explore the regulatory effects of substituents on mol­ecular structures and solid-state properties, the title quinoline-based fenamate derivative was constructed by introducing a 3-chloro-2-methyl disubstituted group onto the N-aryl ring. The substituent effects on mol­ecular conformations, hydrogen-bonding inter­actions and crystal packing were investigated, providing theoretical support for structural modification of this class of anti-inflammatory derivatives.

Herein, 2-[(3-chloro-2-methyl­phen­yl)amino]­quinoline-3-carb­oxy­lic acid (Fig. 1[link]) was synthesized by a two-step route using 2-chloro­quinoline-3-carb­oxy­lic acid and 3-chloro-2-methyl­aniline as starting materials. applying the palladium-catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling, followed by alkaline hydrolysis, acidification and purification (Janke et al. 2019View full citation). A strong intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond is present in the mol­ecule (Table 1[link]), with a donor–acceptor distance of 2.6919 (13) Å and a bond angle of 140°. This inter­action effectively restricts the free rotation of aromatic rings, yielding an approximately planar mol­ecular conformation with a dihedral angle of 7.17 (5)° between the quinoline ring system and the substituted benzene ring.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i 0.82 1.83 2.6532 (13) 177
N2—H2⋯O2 0.86 1.97 2.6919 (13) 140
Symmetry code: (i) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

In the crystal, adjacent mol­ecules self-assemble into centrosymmetric carb­oxy­lic acid dimers through pairwise O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The donor–acceptor distance is 2.6532 (13) Å and the bond angle is 177°. These dimers further adopt a layered packing pattern (Fig. 2[link]). The centroid-to-centroid distance between adjacent aromatic rings is 4.9749 (7) Å, hence no effective ππ stacking inter­actions are observed.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Packing of the mol­ecules in the title compound (for clarity, H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding are omitted).

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was synthesized in two steps using a Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reaction followed by hydrolysis (Fig. 3[link]). The compound was purified by column chromatography. Pale-yellow transparent block-shaped single crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were grown by slow evaporation of an anhydrous ethyl acetate solution at ambient temperature.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Synthesis of the title compound.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link].

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C17H13ClN2O2
Mr 312.74
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 298
a, b, c (Å) 27.6987 (4), 4.97483 (8), 24.2475 (4)
β (°) 97.6652 (14)
V3) 3311.36 (9)
Z 8
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 2.11
Crystal size (mm) 0.22 × 0.17 × 0.13
 
Data collection
Diffractometer XtaLAB Synergy R, DW system, HyPix
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.747, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 15744, 3303, 2939
Rint 0.020
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.630
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.038, 0.119, 1.08
No. of reflections 3303
No. of parameters 201
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.17, −0.35
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2024View full citation), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

2-[(3-Chloro-2-methylphenyl)amino]quinoline-3-carboxylic acid top
Crystal data top
C17H13ClN2O2F(000) = 1296
Mr = 312.74Dx = 1.255 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 27.6987 (4) ÅCell parameters from 11991 reflections
b = 4.97483 (8) Åθ = 3.7–75.3°
c = 24.2475 (4) ŵ = 2.11 mm1
β = 97.6652 (14)°T = 298 K
V = 3311.36 (9) Å3Block, clear light yellow
Z = 80.22 × 0.17 × 0.13 mm
Data collection top
XtaLAB Synergy R, DW system, HyPix
diffractometer
3303 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating-anode X-ray tube, Rigaku (Cu) X-ray Source2939 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.020
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1θmax = 76.4°, θmin = 4.6°
ω scansh = 3434
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024)
k = 66
Tmin = 0.747, Tmax = 1.000l = 2929
15744 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.119 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0732P)2 + 0.6877P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
3303 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
201 parametersΔρmin = 0.35 e Å3
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. The position of the H atom in O and the position of the H atom in C are obtained from the differential Fourier diagram. The geometric positioning of the H atom is C—H = 0.93 for the aromatic group.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.05724 (2)0.47003 (12)0.64179 (2)0.08519 (19)
O10.31240 (3)1.13616 (19)0.52322 (4)0.0517 (2)
H10.2958881.2434530.5031010.078*
O20.23926 (3)1.00467 (18)0.54053 (4)0.0498 (2)
N10.30894 (4)0.4131 (2)0.65151 (4)0.0446 (2)
N20.23512 (4)0.5993 (2)0.61329 (4)0.0461 (3)
H20.2218130.7096010.5884800.055*
C00H0.13698 (5)0.7379 (3)0.58383 (6)0.0592 (4)
H00A0.1528060.9051600.5945160.089*
H00B0.1023090.7614830.5802780.089*
H00C0.1460330.6803770.5488260.089*
C10.28489 (4)0.5914 (2)0.61842 (4)0.0398 (3)
C20.30970 (4)0.7816 (2)0.58646 (4)0.0400 (3)
C30.35948 (5)0.7756 (3)0.59269 (5)0.0466 (3)
H30.3761650.8950910.5725720.056*
C40.38588 (5)0.5910 (3)0.62913 (5)0.0482 (3)
C50.43749 (5)0.5861 (3)0.63887 (7)0.0636 (4)
H50.4554800.7048920.6201050.076*
C60.46074 (6)0.4060 (4)0.67600 (7)0.0699 (4)
H60.4945810.4043760.6829810.084*
C70.43373 (6)0.2248 (3)0.70336 (6)0.0658 (4)
H70.4499720.1013350.7279940.079*
C80.38385 (6)0.2244 (3)0.69483 (5)0.0562 (3)
H80.3666140.1012200.7134570.067*
C90.35855 (5)0.4118 (2)0.65761 (5)0.0445 (3)
C100.28369 (4)0.9822 (2)0.54854 (5)0.0405 (3)
C110.20208 (5)0.4583 (2)0.64160 (5)0.0436 (3)
C120.15239 (5)0.5282 (3)0.62760 (5)0.0462 (3)
C130.11928 (5)0.3953 (3)0.65606 (6)0.0541 (3)
C140.13227 (6)0.2027 (3)0.69635 (6)0.0614 (4)
H140.1088690.1193190.7146220.074*
C150.18075 (6)0.1376 (3)0.70868 (6)0.0628 (4)
H150.1902160.0079370.7355930.075*
C160.21570 (5)0.2618 (3)0.68171 (5)0.0543 (3)
H160.2482980.2142140.6903440.065*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0481 (2)0.1171 (4)0.0934 (3)0.0027 (2)0.0205 (2)0.0133 (3)
O10.0459 (5)0.0534 (5)0.0560 (5)0.0025 (4)0.0072 (4)0.0183 (4)
O20.0420 (5)0.0501 (5)0.0562 (5)0.0036 (4)0.0028 (4)0.0170 (4)
N10.0476 (6)0.0440 (5)0.0410 (5)0.0062 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0040 (4)
N20.0419 (5)0.0469 (6)0.0485 (5)0.0033 (4)0.0023 (4)0.0134 (4)
C00H0.0480 (7)0.0663 (9)0.0632 (8)0.0113 (6)0.0071 (6)0.0121 (7)
C10.0438 (6)0.0381 (6)0.0365 (5)0.0030 (5)0.0016 (4)0.0006 (4)
C20.0428 (6)0.0384 (6)0.0379 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0019 (4)0.0000 (4)
C30.0438 (6)0.0478 (7)0.0480 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0050 (5)0.0023 (5)
C40.0442 (7)0.0505 (7)0.0484 (6)0.0084 (5)0.0002 (5)0.0032 (5)
C50.0454 (7)0.0704 (9)0.0735 (9)0.0082 (7)0.0025 (6)0.0019 (7)
C60.0471 (8)0.0819 (11)0.0765 (10)0.0207 (7)0.0073 (7)0.0049 (8)
C70.0661 (9)0.0672 (9)0.0585 (8)0.0262 (8)0.0125 (7)0.0020 (7)
C80.0630 (8)0.0548 (7)0.0478 (7)0.0162 (6)0.0034 (6)0.0019 (6)
C90.0497 (7)0.0442 (6)0.0376 (5)0.0092 (5)0.0014 (5)0.0054 (5)
C100.0439 (6)0.0383 (6)0.0387 (5)0.0015 (5)0.0035 (5)0.0012 (4)
C110.0465 (7)0.0421 (6)0.0419 (6)0.0016 (5)0.0056 (5)0.0008 (5)
C120.0475 (7)0.0466 (6)0.0448 (6)0.0009 (5)0.0074 (5)0.0032 (5)
C130.0490 (7)0.0612 (8)0.0534 (7)0.0026 (6)0.0115 (5)0.0063 (6)
C140.0648 (9)0.0666 (9)0.0558 (8)0.0103 (7)0.0189 (6)0.0051 (7)
C150.0714 (9)0.0633 (9)0.0540 (7)0.0057 (7)0.0090 (7)0.0158 (7)
C160.0548 (7)0.0549 (7)0.0520 (7)0.0016 (6)0.0029 (6)0.0131 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C131.7470 (15)C4—C51.4175 (19)
O1—C101.3138 (14)C4—C91.4088 (19)
O2—C101.2253 (15)C5—C61.369 (2)
N1—C11.3158 (15)C6—C71.395 (3)
N1—C91.3623 (16)C7—C81.369 (2)
N2—C11.3682 (15)C8—C91.4163 (17)
N2—C111.4029 (16)C11—C121.4162 (18)
C00H—C121.5087 (18)C11—C161.3952 (17)
C1—C21.4525 (16)C12—C131.3867 (19)
C2—C31.3674 (17)C13—C141.381 (2)
C2—C101.4777 (15)C14—C151.375 (2)
C3—C41.4094 (18)C15—C161.384 (2)
C1—N1—C9119.40 (11)N1—C9—C8118.60 (12)
C1—N2—C11131.02 (10)C4—C9—C8118.46 (12)
N1—C1—N2119.80 (11)O1—C10—C2114.17 (10)
N1—C1—C2121.82 (11)O2—C10—O1122.03 (10)
N2—C1—C2118.38 (10)O2—C10—C2123.79 (11)
C1—C2—C10123.09 (10)N2—C11—C12115.89 (11)
C3—C2—C1117.96 (10)C16—C11—N2123.92 (12)
C3—C2—C10118.95 (11)C16—C11—C12120.19 (12)
C2—C3—C4120.97 (12)C11—C12—C00H120.85 (12)
C3—C4—C5122.89 (13)C13—C12—C00H122.41 (12)
C9—C4—C3116.87 (12)C13—C12—C11116.74 (12)
C9—C4—C5120.22 (12)C12—C13—Cl1119.89 (11)
C6—C5—C4119.76 (16)C14—C13—Cl1116.37 (11)
C5—C6—C7120.05 (15)C14—C13—C12123.74 (13)
C8—C7—C6121.58 (13)C15—C14—C13118.15 (13)
C7—C8—C9119.91 (15)C14—C15—C16121.10 (13)
N1—C9—C4122.94 (11)C15—C16—C11120.08 (13)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2i0.821.832.6532 (13)177
N2—H2···O20.861.972.6919 (13)140
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+5/2, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

YJZ and SL thank the Graduate Innovation Fund of WIT for financial support.

References

Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationJanke, J., Villinger, A., Ehlers, P. & Langer, P. (2019). Synlett 30, 817–820.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLuan, Y. H., Wang, D., Yu, Q. & Chai, X. Q. (2017). J. Clin. Anesth. 37, 123–128.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationUzoh, O. G., Cruz-Cabeza, A. J. & Price, S. L. (2012). Cryst. Growth Des. 12, 4230–4239.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146