organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

Propyl 4-amino­benzoate

crossmark logo

aPO Box 6949, Radford University, Radford, Virginia 24142, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

(Received 28 April 2026; accepted 30 April 2026; online 7 May 2026)

The structure of the title compound, C10H13NO2, shows the n-propyl group to be perpendicular to the remaining part of the mol­ecule; carboxyl­ate-C—O—C—C(n-prop­yl) torsion angle = −87.05 (19)°. In the crystal, amine-N—H⋯O(carbon­yl) and weaker amine-N—H⋯N(amine) hydrogen bonding occurs within double layers parallel to the ab plane. The hydrogen atoms of the methyl group are disordered over two sets of sites in the ratio 0.89 (3) to 0.11 (3).

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

The reaction of 4-amino­benzoic acid with 1-propanol yielded the title compound n-propyl 4-amino­benzoate (risocaine). Risocaine, its isomer, isopropyl 4-amino­benzoate, and amines with similar structures have medical applications such as pain relievers (Priyanka et al., 2022View full citation).

The crystal structure we report complements the physical and spectroscopic data collected as part of a guided inquiry undergraduate Organic Chemistry laboratory experiment (Hermann et al., 2026View full citation). In this guided inquiry experiment, students synthesized and characterized solid esters, selected for ease of purification and handling. Students were provided with a list of possible carb­oxy­lic acids and alcohols but not the specific reactants assigned to each group. After synthesis, they compared the observed melting point range of their product to a reference table. Furthermore, students recorded the IR,1H NMR, and 13C NMR spectra of their product to confirm their conclusions from the melting point range.

Referring to Fig. 1[link], the C9 atom of the n-propyl group is close to perpendicular to the carboxyl­ate residue as seen in the C7—O1—C8—C9 torsion angle of −87.05 (19)°. The equivalent torsion angles for one of the terminal –CH3 groups in isopropyl 4-amino­benzoate (two independent mol­ecules) are −77.8 (4) and −86.5 (4)°, while the other –CH3 groups approach coplanarity, i.e. 159.5 (3) and 152.5 (4)° (Priyanka et al., 2022View full citation). The carboxyl­ate [the C2—C1—C7—O2 torsion angle = 176.86 (17)°] and amine [C2—C3—C4—N1 = 174.94 (17)°] groups are close to coplanar to the benzene ring to which they are connected.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of the title compound showing displacement ellipsoids at the 30% probability level. Only the major component of the disordered hydrogen atoms on C10 are shown.

The mol­ecular packing (Fig. 2[link]) shows hydrogen-bonding inter­actions between the amine functional group and the carbonyl group of the ester and weaker amine-N—H⋯N(amine) hydrogen bonding; distances and angle are listed in Table 1[link]. The hydrogen bonding occurs within double layers that stack along the c axis.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯N1i 0.88 (2) 2.55 (2) 3.397 (3) 162 (2)
N1—H1B⋯O2ii 0.88 (2) 2.09 (2) 2.964 (2) 173 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal packing viewed along the b axis. Hydrogen-bonding interactions are shown as dashed lines.

Synthesis and crystallization

Referring to Fig. 3[link], the title compound was synthesized through a Fischer esterification. A mixture of 4-amino­benzoic acid (1.5 g), 1-propanol (10 ml), and concentrated sulfuric acid (1 ml) was refluxed in a 50 ml boiling flask for 1 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool; a solution of 10% sodium carbonate was added until a pH of 8 was obtained. The solution was chilled in an ice bath until a solid product was formed. The solid was isolated by vacuum filtration.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Reaction scheme for the title compound.

The yield was 0.864 grams (57.0%) with a melting point of 72.7°C, which compared to a literature value of 73–75°C. The IR and NMR spectra confirmed the structure (Hermann et al., 2026View full citation).

X-ray quality crystals were produced by dissolving the product into methanol, followed by adding an equal volume of hexa­nes. The solvent was allowed to evaporate over several days. A single-crystal was coated with NVH oil and mounted on a MiTeGen loop then cooled to −40 °C for data collection.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection, and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. The hydrogen atoms on the methyl-C10 atom are disordered over two positions and refined to a 0.89 (3) to 0.11 (3) occupancy ratio.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C10H13NO2
Mr 179.21
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 233
a, b, c (Å) 8.5011 (3), 5.8300 (2), 19.7631 (8)
β (°) 95.453 (2)
V3) 975.05 (6)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.09
Crystal size (mm) 0.41 × 0.21 × 0.21
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.966, 0.982
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 37794, 2427, 2283
Rint 0.039
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.668
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.069, 0.159, 1.17
No. of reflections 2427
No. of parameters 126
No. of restraints 5
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.39, −0.27
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2019View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/2 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and ShelXle (Hübschle et al., 2011View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

Propyl 4-aminobenzoate top
Crystal data top
C10H13NO2F(000) = 384
Mr = 179.21Dx = 1.221 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.5011 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9986 reflections
b = 5.8300 (2) Åθ = 3.7–28.3°
c = 19.7631 (8) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 95.453 (2)°T = 233 K
V = 975.05 (6) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.41 × 0.21 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8
diffractometer
2427 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2283 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Flat graphite monochromatorRint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 7.391 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.7°
ω and φ scansh = 1111
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
k = 77
Tmin = 0.966, Tmax = 0.982l = 2626
37794 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: Intrinsic Phasing
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.069H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.159 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0557P)2 + 0.6285P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.17(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2427 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
126 parametersΔρmin = 0.27 e Å3
5 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.41184 (15)0.7084 (2)0.39339 (8)0.0407 (4)
O20.52677 (15)0.3933 (2)0.35610 (7)0.0420 (4)
N10.21045 (19)0.1716 (3)0.29235 (10)0.0450 (4)
H1A0.220 (3)0.028 (3)0.2790 (13)0.068*
H1B0.287 (2)0.229 (4)0.3145 (13)0.068*
C10.24626 (19)0.4106 (3)0.35136 (8)0.0300 (4)
C20.1139 (2)0.5332 (3)0.36787 (10)0.0362 (4)
H20.1274290.6731330.3913340.043*
C30.0363 (2)0.4507 (3)0.35001 (10)0.0389 (4)
H30.1241410.5345620.3617800.047*
C40.0597 (2)0.2444 (3)0.31471 (9)0.0324 (4)
C50.0731 (2)0.1194 (3)0.29957 (9)0.0327 (4)
H50.0597560.0221640.2769560.039*
C60.2229 (2)0.2018 (3)0.31749 (9)0.0320 (4)
H60.3107630.1161250.3067310.038*
C70.4082 (2)0.4970 (3)0.36686 (9)0.0313 (4)
C80.5655 (2)0.8188 (3)0.40383 (11)0.0403 (4)
H8A0.5515420.9854950.4009070.048*
H8B0.6298780.7717080.3676730.048*
C90.6508 (2)0.7587 (4)0.47167 (11)0.0471 (5)
H9A0.6807610.5963040.4721270.057*
H9B0.5806940.7835090.5075940.057*
C100.7985 (3)0.9069 (5)0.48517 (14)0.0621 (7)
H10A0.8660550.8855910.4487920.093*0.89 (3)
H10B0.8551800.8623160.5280670.093*0.89 (3)
H10C0.7680121.0668750.4872290.093*0.89 (3)
H10D0.7934440.9909310.5272670.093*0.11 (3)
H10E0.8043181.0142050.4479920.093*0.11 (3)
H10F0.8914860.8096460.4888290.093*0.11 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0293 (6)0.0326 (7)0.0598 (9)0.0002 (5)0.0014 (6)0.0065 (6)
O20.0275 (6)0.0401 (8)0.0582 (9)0.0056 (5)0.0037 (6)0.0025 (6)
N10.0287 (8)0.0482 (10)0.0585 (11)0.0060 (7)0.0061 (7)0.0119 (9)
C10.0271 (8)0.0291 (8)0.0336 (8)0.0033 (6)0.0022 (6)0.0025 (7)
C20.0315 (8)0.0311 (9)0.0457 (10)0.0040 (7)0.0017 (7)0.0074 (8)
C30.0270 (8)0.0363 (10)0.0538 (11)0.0090 (7)0.0054 (7)0.0077 (8)
C40.0273 (8)0.0354 (9)0.0344 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0035 (6)0.0025 (7)
C50.0347 (9)0.0290 (8)0.0345 (8)0.0001 (7)0.0040 (7)0.0042 (7)
C60.0278 (8)0.0311 (9)0.0375 (9)0.0057 (7)0.0051 (6)0.0016 (7)
C70.0295 (8)0.0299 (8)0.0344 (8)0.0032 (7)0.0021 (6)0.0042 (7)
C80.0355 (9)0.0317 (9)0.0534 (11)0.0063 (8)0.0025 (8)0.0034 (8)
C90.0427 (11)0.0492 (12)0.0489 (11)0.0090 (9)0.0010 (9)0.0010 (9)
C100.0493 (13)0.0730 (17)0.0619 (14)0.0224 (12)0.0059 (10)0.0058 (13)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C71.338 (2)C2—C31.379 (3)
O1—C81.453 (2)C3—C41.395 (3)
O2—C71.212 (2)C4—C51.400 (2)
N1—C41.382 (2)C5—C61.376 (2)
C1—C61.394 (2)C8—C91.504 (3)
C1—C21.398 (2)C9—C101.527 (3)
C1—C71.470 (2)
C7—O1—C8116.80 (14)C3—C4—C5118.45 (16)
C6—C1—C2118.51 (16)C6—C5—C4120.56 (16)
C6—C1—C7119.17 (15)C5—C6—C1121.01 (16)
C2—C1—C7122.30 (16)O2—C7—O1122.63 (16)
C3—C2—C1120.55 (17)O2—C7—C1124.79 (17)
C2—C3—C4120.88 (16)O1—C7—C1112.57 (14)
N1—C4—C3120.56 (16)O1—C8—C9111.97 (16)
N1—C4—C5120.92 (17)C8—C9—C10110.04 (19)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···N1i0.88 (2)2.55 (2)3.397 (3)162 (2)
N1—H1B···O2ii0.88 (2)2.09 (2)2.964 (2)173 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x1, y, z.
 

References

Return to citationBruker (2019). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationHermann, C. K. F., Gutzwiller, A., Addison, G. & Turner, B. (2026). Engaging Students in Organic Chemistry vol. 2, ch. 7, pp. 91–101. ACS Symposium Series, vol. 1521. https:/doi.org/10.1021/bk-2026-1521.ch007.  Google Scholar
Return to citationHübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationPriyanka, P., Jayanna, B. K., Kiran Kumar, H., Yathirajan, H. S., Divakara, T. R., Foro, S. & Butcher, R. J. (2022). IUCrData 7, x220904.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146