organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

2-[(2,5-Di­methyl­phen­yl)amino]­quinoline-3-carb­­oxy­lic acid

crossmark logo

aSchool of Chemical Engineering and Pharmacy, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430205, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by I. Brito, University of Antofagasta, Chile (Received 12 May 2026; accepted 23 May 2026; online 29 May 2026)

The title compound, C18H16N2O2, was synthesized via a two-step route with the Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reaction. The quinoline ring system and phenyl ring of the mol­ecule are nearly coplanar with a dihedral angle of 6.51 (5)°. In the crystal, adjacent mol­ecules form carb­oxy­lic acid dimers via inter­molecular hydrogen bonding.

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a class of medicines that exert anti­pyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting cyclo­oxygenase (COX). They are widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and acute pain (Vishwakarma & Negi, 2020View full citation). Classic NSAIDs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, and flurbiprofen all contain an aryl­propionic acid or aryl­acetic acid structure, and their efficacy is closely related to the carboxyl group in the mol­ecule (Astrvatham et al., 2019View full citation). However, these drugs usually suffer from poor water solubility, variable bioavailability, and gastrointestinal adverse effects. In recent years, studies have shown that the polymorphism of solid drugs directly affects their solubility, dissolution rate, stability, and even biological activity (Bindu et al., 2020View full citation). For example, different polymorphs of ibuprofen exhibit significantly different dissolution behaviors, which in turn affect in vivo absorption (Zhou et al., 2024View full citation). Therefore, systematic studies on the polymorphism of NSAIDs are of great significance for optimizing formulation processes, improving therapeutic efficacy, and circumventing patents (Ley et al., 2025View full citation). Research on drug polymorphism holds promise for discovering new crystal forms of drugs, thereby enhancing their druggability and providing a solid scientific basis for generic drug development. Furthermore, clarifying the polymorphic behavior of inter­mediates or products can provide key guidance for subsequent formulation screening, helping to select the thermodynamically stable crystal form with the best bioavailability, thereby reducing the risk of efficacy fluctuations caused by crystal form transformation.

In the title compound (Fig. 1[link]), the two aromatic moieties are nearly coplanar with a dihedral angle of 6.51 (5)°. In the crystal (Fig. 2[link]), adjacent mol­ecules form carb­oxy­lic acid dimers via inter­molecular hydrogen bonding (Table 1[link]).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2 0.86 1.96 2.6925 (13) 142
C15—H15⋯N1 0.93 2.30 2.9134 (15) 123
O1—H1⋯O2i 0.82 1.85 2.6702 (12) 178
Symmetry code: (i) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Packing of the mol­ecules in the title compound (for clarity, H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding are omitted).

Synthesis and crystallization

The target compound 2-[(2,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)amino]­quinoline-3-carb­oxy­lic acid was synthesized (Fig. 3[link]) via a two-step route with the Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reaction. In the first step, methyl 2-chloro­quinoline-3-carboxyl­ate reacted with 2,5-di­methyl­aniline in toluene for 24 h using Pd(OAc)2/BINAP as the catalytic system and Cs2CO3 as the base. The inter­mediate methyl 2-[(2,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)amino]­quinoline-3-carboxyl­ate was obtained by extraction followed by column chromatography. In the second step, the above inter­mediate was hydrolyzed in an aqueous ethanol solution containing KOH for 6 h. After the reaction, the mixture was acidified, and the target product was isolated by extraction and purified by column chromatography. Pure 2-[(2,5-di­methyl­phen­yl)amino]­quinoline-3-carb­oxy­lic acid was dried for 8 h. Single crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanol solution at room temperature.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Synthesis of the title compound.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link].

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C18H16N2O2
Mr 292.33
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PMathematical equation
Temperature (K) 299
a, b, c (Å) 4.80942 (7), 11.8944 (2), 12.9466 (2)
α, β, γ (°) 88.9803 (13), 85.8751 (12), 84.4910 (12)
V3) 735.24 (2)
Z 2
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.70
Crystal size (mm) 0.21 × 0.05 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer XtaLAB Synergy R, DW system, HyPix
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2024View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.805, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7863, 2904, 2659
Rint 0.021
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.629
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.118, 1.07
No. of reflections 2904
No. of parameters 203
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.22, −0.16
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2024View full citation), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

2-[(2,5-Dimethylphenyl)amino]quinoline-3-carboxylic acid top
Crystal data top
C18H16N2O2Z = 2
Mr = 292.33F(000) = 308
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.320 Mg m3
a = 4.80942 (7) ÅCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
b = 11.8944 (2) ÅCell parameters from 2760 reflections
c = 12.9466 (2) Åθ = 3.4–74.8°
α = 88.9803 (13)°µ = 0.70 mm1
β = 85.8751 (12)°T = 299 K
γ = 84.4910 (12)°Needle, clear dark yellow
V = 735.24 (2) Å30.21 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm
Data collection top
XtaLAB Synergy R, DW system, HyPix
diffractometer
2904 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating-anode X-ray tube, Rigaku (Cu) X-ray Source2659 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1θmax = 76.0°, θmin = 3.4°
ω scansh = 55
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024)
k = 1414
Tmin = 0.805, Tmax = 1.000l = 1616
7863 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0644P)2 + 0.1121P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.118(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
2904 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
203 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0035 (12)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. The position of the H atom in O and the position of the H atom in C are obtained from the differential Fourier diagram. The geometric positioning of the H atom is C—H = 0.93 for the aromatic group and the geometric positioning of the H atom is O—H = 0.82 for the methyl group.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.35770 (17)0.61275 (7)0.41684 (7)0.0472 (2)
H10.4798820.5997900.4617710.071*
O20.23465 (17)0.42979 (7)0.44090 (6)0.0456 (2)
N10.4312 (2)0.45264 (8)0.20624 (7)0.0415 (3)
N20.2069 (2)0.33488 (8)0.32298 (8)0.0437 (3)
H20.0704820.3329180.3695110.052*
C10.2313 (2)0.43900 (9)0.27944 (8)0.0360 (3)
C20.0353 (2)0.53280 (9)0.31657 (8)0.0362 (3)
C30.0700 (2)0.63768 (10)0.27559 (9)0.0429 (3)
H30.0508590.6991940.2988620.052*
C40.2853 (2)0.65434 (10)0.19880 (9)0.0428 (3)
C50.3314 (3)0.76093 (12)0.15430 (12)0.0604 (4)
H50.2211140.8251720.1777800.072*
C60.5367 (3)0.77007 (13)0.07711 (12)0.0641 (4)
H60.5654160.8403740.0478880.077*
C70.7041 (3)0.67368 (13)0.04186 (11)0.0585 (4)
H70.8416040.6804190.0115950.070*
C80.6686 (3)0.57010 (12)0.08475 (10)0.0510 (3)
H80.7837430.5071890.0610760.061*
C90.4577 (2)0.55755 (10)0.16501 (9)0.0396 (3)
C100.3639 (2)0.23006 (9)0.30574 (9)0.0392 (3)
C110.2930 (2)0.14151 (10)0.37352 (9)0.0426 (3)
C120.4354 (3)0.03583 (11)0.35730 (11)0.0518 (3)
H120.3901720.0237590.4008310.062*
C130.6432 (3)0.01616 (11)0.27818 (11)0.0532 (3)
H130.7338640.0559920.2690380.064*
C140.7167 (3)0.10343 (11)0.21262 (10)0.0459 (3)
C150.5758 (2)0.21017 (10)0.22698 (9)0.0436 (3)
H150.6236130.2693430.1833890.052*
C160.1953 (2)0.51938 (9)0.39614 (8)0.0365 (3)
C170.0690 (3)0.15969 (11)0.46105 (10)0.0519 (3)
H17A0.1019860.2244030.5000770.078*
H17B0.0739230.0941700.5055050.078*
H17C0.1112490.1720650.4332340.078*
C180.9457 (3)0.08438 (12)0.12718 (11)0.0586 (4)
H18A0.9195230.1414360.0744710.088*
H18B0.9389630.0112420.0977870.088*
H18C1.1242630.0883310.1549020.088*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0412 (5)0.0431 (5)0.0534 (5)0.0014 (3)0.0146 (4)0.0031 (4)
O20.0426 (4)0.0430 (5)0.0478 (5)0.0009 (3)0.0145 (3)0.0055 (4)
N10.0430 (5)0.0402 (5)0.0397 (5)0.0053 (4)0.0101 (4)0.0021 (4)
N20.0438 (5)0.0379 (5)0.0460 (5)0.0023 (4)0.0172 (4)0.0046 (4)
C10.0355 (5)0.0381 (6)0.0339 (5)0.0050 (4)0.0038 (4)0.0008 (4)
C20.0330 (5)0.0404 (6)0.0346 (5)0.0040 (4)0.0019 (4)0.0015 (4)
C30.0399 (6)0.0404 (6)0.0466 (6)0.0001 (4)0.0037 (5)0.0042 (5)
C40.0410 (6)0.0431 (6)0.0440 (6)0.0059 (5)0.0008 (5)0.0081 (5)
C50.0599 (8)0.0465 (7)0.0715 (9)0.0028 (6)0.0101 (7)0.0167 (7)
C60.0665 (9)0.0556 (8)0.0692 (9)0.0152 (7)0.0087 (7)0.0243 (7)
C70.0580 (8)0.0679 (9)0.0493 (7)0.0190 (7)0.0125 (6)0.0115 (6)
C80.0519 (7)0.0553 (7)0.0447 (7)0.0115 (6)0.0126 (5)0.0025 (6)
C90.0392 (6)0.0455 (6)0.0345 (5)0.0091 (5)0.0012 (4)0.0031 (5)
C100.0391 (6)0.0359 (6)0.0418 (6)0.0045 (4)0.0041 (4)0.0000 (4)
C110.0425 (6)0.0401 (6)0.0449 (6)0.0081 (5)0.0051 (5)0.0009 (5)
C120.0571 (7)0.0380 (6)0.0587 (8)0.0062 (5)0.0067 (6)0.0071 (5)
C130.0554 (7)0.0382 (6)0.0630 (8)0.0034 (5)0.0068 (6)0.0009 (6)
C140.0445 (6)0.0455 (6)0.0459 (6)0.0003 (5)0.0048 (5)0.0044 (5)
C150.0450 (6)0.0400 (6)0.0439 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0084 (5)0.0018 (5)
C160.0327 (5)0.0405 (6)0.0357 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0006 (4)0.0004 (4)
C170.0580 (8)0.0431 (7)0.0526 (7)0.0102 (5)0.0160 (6)0.0049 (5)
C180.0585 (8)0.0562 (8)0.0560 (8)0.0074 (6)0.0148 (6)0.0047 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C161.3150 (13)C5—C61.364 (2)
O2—C161.2281 (13)C6—C71.400 (2)
N1—C11.3199 (14)C7—C81.3631 (19)
N1—C91.3621 (15)C8—C91.4149 (15)
N2—C11.3633 (14)C10—C111.4102 (16)
N2—C101.4070 (14)C10—C151.3954 (15)
C1—C21.4549 (15)C11—C121.3844 (18)
C2—C31.3672 (16)C11—C171.5099 (16)
C2—C161.4765 (14)C12—C131.3855 (19)
C3—C41.4087 (16)C13—C141.3852 (18)
C4—C51.4135 (17)C14—C151.3894 (17)
C4—C91.4095 (17)C14—C181.5078 (17)
C1—N1—C9119.30 (10)N1—C9—C8118.53 (11)
C1—N2—C10131.81 (9)C4—C9—C8118.43 (11)
N1—C1—N2119.81 (10)N2—C10—C11115.75 (10)
N1—C1—C2121.83 (10)C15—C10—N2124.25 (10)
N2—C1—C2118.36 (9)C15—C10—C11120.00 (11)
C1—C2—C16122.98 (10)C10—C11—C17121.81 (11)
C3—C2—C1117.75 (10)C12—C11—C10117.80 (11)
C3—C2—C16119.27 (10)C12—C11—C17120.38 (11)
C2—C3—C4121.26 (11)C11—C12—C13121.98 (11)
C3—C4—C5123.55 (12)C14—C13—C12120.32 (11)
C3—C4—C9116.75 (11)C13—C14—C15118.79 (11)
C9—C4—C5119.68 (11)C13—C14—C18121.21 (11)
C6—C5—C4120.36 (14)C15—C14—C18120.00 (11)
C5—C6—C7120.03 (12)C14—C15—C10121.09 (11)
C8—C7—C6120.95 (12)O1—C16—C2114.30 (9)
C7—C8—C9120.51 (13)O2—C16—O1121.77 (9)
N1—C9—C4123.04 (10)O2—C16—C2123.92 (10)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2···O20.861.962.6925 (13)142
C15—H15···N10.932.302.9134 (15)123
O1—H1···O2i0.821.852.6702 (12)178
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y+1, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

XJ and SL thank the Graduate Innovation Fund of WIT for financial support.

References

Return to citationAstrvatham, S., Dhokchawle, B. V. & Tausro, S. J. (2019). Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 12: 3948.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBindu, S., Mazumder, S. & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2020). Biochem. Pharmacol. 180, 114147.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLey, E., Sroda, M. & Maslanka, G. (2025). Methods Protoc. 8, 9.  PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMacrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationVishwakarma, R. K. & Negi, D. S. (2020). Int. J. Pharm. Res. 11, 3544–3555.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationZhou, S., Yang, T. & qian, C. (2024). J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 100, 106070.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146