organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

Monoclinic polymorph of 2-aza­niumylmethyl-1H-benzimidazol-3-ium dichloride monohydrate

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemistry, Mother Teresa Women's University, Kodaikanal, Tamil Nadu, India, bChemistry Department, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, United Kingdom, and cDepartment of Crystallography and Biophysics, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai-600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 15 September 2025; accepted 3 October 2025; online 7 October 2025)

The title hydrated salt, C8H11N32+·2Cl·H2O, is a monoclinic polymorph of the previously reported triclinic form. The compound crystallizes in space group P21/c with Z′ = 1. The crystal structure features N—H⋯O, N—H⋯Cl and O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds and aromatic ππ stacking inter­actions, forming a three-dimensional network.

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

Benzimidazole-based systems have attracted attention as ligands for metal complexation owing to the desirable properties that are beneficial for biological applications such as anti-bacterial (Kankate et al., 2019View full citation) and anti-hypertensive (Sharma et al., 2013View full citation) effects. The materials applications of benzimidazole ligands include luminescent properties of their metal complexes, which can be applied in electroluminescent devices (Wu et al., 2008View full citation). The larger conjugated π-system and the nitro­gen electron donor of the secondary amine group of the benzimidazole moiety play an important role in determining the properties of the complexes. As part of our work in this area, we now describe the synthesis and structure of the title benzimidazolium salt, C8H11N32+·2Cl·H2O.

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 6.00, update April 2025; Groom et al., 2016View full citation) for the 2-ammonium­ylmethyl-1H -benzimidazol-3-ium (C8H11N32+) dication, generated three hits: a tetra­chloro­zinc(II) salt (CSD refcode COKXAC; Tapia-Benavides et al., 2008View full citation), the solvent-free dichloride salt (NEPKOK; Malecki, 2011View full citation) and the triclinic polymorph of the title compound (NINWIT; Sen et al., 2018View full citation).

The title compound crystallizes in a new monoclinic form in space group P21/c compared with the previously reported triclinic form, in space group PMathematical equation (Sen et al., 2018View full citation). In the monoclinic polymorph, the asymmetric unit contains a benzimidazolium dication, two chloride ions, and a water mol­ecule with Z′ = 1 (Fig. 1[link]). In the more complex triclinic polymorph, the asymmetric unit contains three benzimidazolium dications, six chloride ions and three water mol­ecules with Z′ = 3 (Sen et al., 2018View full citation). One notable feature is that in the solvent-free salt (Malecki, 2011View full citation), the pendant CH2NH3 moiety has a substantial torsion angle of ca. 59° relative to the plane of the fused rings, while in both monohydrate polymorphs, in all the unique mol­ecules, that angle is < 10°, so that moiety is close to co-planar with the fused rings.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The asymmetric unit of the title compound with 50% probability ellipsoids showing hydrogen bonds as dashed lines.

In the monoclinic polymorph described here, all the N—H groups form strong, charge-assisted, hydrogen bonds to either chloride anions or the water oxygen atom (Table 1[link]). The water mol­ecule forms O—H⋯Cl links to two chloride ions. The mol­ecules pack in sheets in the ab plane and these sheets are then hydrogen bonded to their neighbours, generating a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2[link]), similar to that of the triclinic polymorph. The cations also display aromatic ππ stacking in the a-axis direction with alternate mol­ecules anti-parallel, with a shortest centroid–centroid separation of 3.4071 (4) Å.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1C⋯Cl1 0.84 (1) 2.32 (1) 3.0898 (8) 152 (1)
N1—H1D⋯Cl2i 0.83 (1) 2.30 (1) 3.1262 (7) 177 (1)
N1—H1E⋯Cl2ii 0.86 (1) 2.41 (1) 3.2430 (7) 163 (1)
N2—H2⋯Cl2 0.866 (16) 2.259 (16) 3.1099 (6) 167.2 (14)
N3—H3⋯O1 0.812 (15) 1.911 (16) 2.7197 (9) 173.6 (15)
O1—H1A⋯Cl2iii 0.80 (1) 2.59 (1) 3.3752 (7) 169 (2)
O1—H1B⋯Cl1iv 0.81 (1) 2.31 (1) 3.1209 (7) 173 (2)
C1—H1F⋯Cl1v 0.988 (13) 2.793 (13) 3.7079 (8) 154.2 (10)
C5—H5⋯Cl1ii 0.926 (13) 2.960 (13) 3.8515 (7) 162.1 (10)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal packing of the title compound viewed down [100].

Synthesis and crystallization

The benzimidazolium cation was prepared following the reported procedure (Cescon & Day, 1962View full citation). About 1 mmol (5.46 g) of o-phenyl­enedi­amine and 1 mmol (5.68 g) of glycine were mixed and dissolved in 100 ml of hydro­chloric acid (5 mol l−1). The solution was refluxed for three days. The reaction mixture was cooled and placed in an ice bath overnight. The resulting purple crystals were isolated from the hydro­chloric acid by filtration, and then recrystallized from ethanol solution, m.p. = 122 °C. From the same re-crystallization, some red crystals of the well known compound o-phenyl­enedi­amine di­hydro­chloride [CSD: PHNDMO; Stålhandske, 1974View full citation) were also identified. We have re-determined that structure to a slightly higher precision (Baskaran et al., 2025View full citation)

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection, and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link].

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C8H11N32+·2Cl·H2O
Mr 238.11
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 100
a, b, c (Å) 6.81630 (11), 12.09585 (19), 12.5226 (2)
β (°) 90.7201 (14)
V3) 1032.39 (3)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.60
Crystal size (mm) 0.18 × 0.15 × 0.07
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Rigaku FRE+ diffractometer with HF Varimax confocal mirrors, a UG2 goniometer and HyPix 6000HE detector
Absorption correction Analytical (CrystalisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.988, 0.994
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 49678, 5003, 4463
Rint 0.057
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.833
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.080, 1.06
No. of reflections 5003
No. of parameters 172
No. of restraints 5
H-atom treatment Only H-atom coordinates refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.72, −0.22
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2024View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

2-Azaniumylmethyl-1H-benzimidazol-3-ium dichloride monohydrate top
Crystal data top
C8H11N32+·2Cl·H2OF(000) = 496
Mr = 238.11Dx = 1.532 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.81630 (11) ÅCell parameters from 29865 reflections
b = 12.09585 (19) Åθ = 2.3–38.0°
c = 12.5226 (2) ŵ = 0.60 mm1
β = 90.7201 (14)°T = 100 K
V = 1032.39 (3) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.18 × 0.15 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku FRE+
diffractometer with HF Varimax confocal mirrors, a UG2 goniometer and HyPix 6000HE detector
5003 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode4463 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.057
profile data from ω–scansθmax = 36.3°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: analytical
(CrystalisPro; Rigaku OD, 2024)
h = 1111
Tmin = 0.988, Tmax = 0.994k = 2020
49678 measured reflectionsl = 2020
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: iterative
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Only H-atom coordinates refined
wR(F2) = 0.080 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0466P)2 + 0.1488P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
5003 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.72 e Å3
172 parametersΔρmin = 0.22 e Å3
5 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. The H atoms atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and their coordinates allowed to refine freely. Uiso(H) values were also freely refined except for those on N1 and C5–C8, which were contstrained and tied to those of the carrier atom with Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(N) and 1.2 Ueq(C).

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.78913 (11)0.09281 (6)0.55978 (6)0.01490 (11)
H1C0.6658 (17)0.0874 (11)0.5557 (11)0.022*
H1D0.824 (2)0.0323 (10)0.5836 (11)0.022*
H1E0.839 (2)0.0984 (11)0.4968 (9)0.022*
C10.84801 (12)0.18467 (7)0.63089 (6)0.01495 (13)
H1F0.991 (2)0.1798 (11)0.6436 (10)0.019 (3)*
H1G0.777 (2)0.1781 (11)0.6978 (11)0.023 (3)*
C20.80152 (10)0.29464 (6)0.58338 (6)0.01152 (11)
N20.83825 (10)0.38973 (5)0.63375 (5)0.01193 (11)
H20.896 (2)0.3946 (13)0.6957 (13)0.030 (4)*
C30.79320 (10)0.47665 (6)0.56549 (6)0.01090 (11)
C40.72336 (10)0.42885 (6)0.47064 (6)0.01071 (11)
N30.73024 (9)0.31486 (5)0.48549 (5)0.01132 (10)
H30.682 (2)0.2691 (12)0.4455 (12)0.026 (3)*
C50.66377 (11)0.49262 (6)0.38340 (6)0.01216 (12)
H50.6100 (18)0.4613 (10)0.3222 (10)0.015*
C60.67891 (11)0.60627 (6)0.39581 (6)0.01288 (12)
H60.6386 (19)0.6514 (11)0.3388 (10)0.015*
C70.74867 (11)0.65425 (6)0.49147 (6)0.01293 (12)
H70.7560 (19)0.7282 (11)0.4942 (10)0.016*
C80.80654 (11)0.59081 (6)0.57854 (6)0.01269 (12)
H80.8465 (19)0.6234 (11)0.6454 (10)0.015*
O10.54805 (9)0.17363 (5)0.34741 (5)0.01701 (11)
H1A0.431 (2)0.1721 (15)0.3536 (14)0.043 (4)*
H1B0.577 (2)0.1084 (12)0.3475 (13)0.038 (4)*
Cl10.35804 (3)0.07804 (2)0.63181 (2)0.01669 (5)
Cl21.05821 (3)0.36655 (2)0.85168 (2)0.01277 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0179 (3)0.0114 (3)0.0153 (3)0.0012 (2)0.0001 (2)0.0004 (2)
C10.0182 (3)0.0123 (3)0.0142 (3)0.0003 (2)0.0031 (2)0.0022 (2)
C20.0113 (3)0.0122 (3)0.0110 (3)0.0004 (2)0.0012 (2)0.0006 (2)
N20.0129 (2)0.0126 (3)0.0102 (2)0.00059 (19)0.00245 (19)0.00026 (19)
C30.0108 (3)0.0118 (3)0.0101 (3)0.0005 (2)0.00105 (19)0.0002 (2)
C40.0107 (3)0.0110 (3)0.0104 (3)0.0001 (2)0.0005 (2)0.0004 (2)
N30.0121 (2)0.0108 (2)0.0109 (2)0.00018 (19)0.00197 (18)0.00061 (19)
C50.0126 (3)0.0134 (3)0.0104 (3)0.0005 (2)0.0013 (2)0.0000 (2)
C60.0131 (3)0.0131 (3)0.0124 (3)0.0003 (2)0.0001 (2)0.0015 (2)
C70.0128 (3)0.0118 (3)0.0142 (3)0.0007 (2)0.0003 (2)0.0001 (2)
C80.0127 (3)0.0127 (3)0.0126 (3)0.0016 (2)0.0008 (2)0.0017 (2)
O10.0162 (3)0.0157 (3)0.0190 (3)0.00068 (19)0.0038 (2)0.0036 (2)
Cl10.01671 (9)0.01516 (9)0.01815 (9)0.00088 (6)0.00154 (6)0.00008 (6)
Cl20.01447 (8)0.01281 (8)0.01098 (7)0.00039 (5)0.00244 (5)0.00001 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C11.4763 (10)C4—N31.3920 (9)
N1—H1C0.844 (12)C4—C51.3938 (10)
N1—H1D0.825 (11)N3—H30.812 (15)
N1—H1E0.864 (11)C5—C61.3872 (11)
C1—C21.4896 (11)C5—H50.926 (13)
C1—H1F0.988 (13)C6—C71.4085 (11)
C1—H1G0.975 (14)C6—H60.937 (13)
C2—N21.3340 (9)C7—C81.3865 (10)
C2—N31.3355 (9)C7—H70.897 (13)
N2—C31.3871 (9)C8—H80.961 (13)
N2—H20.866 (16)O1—H1A0.802 (14)
C3—C81.3933 (10)O1—H1B0.813 (14)
C3—C41.3991 (10)
C1—N1—H1C111.0 (9)C8—C3—C4122.02 (7)
C1—N1—H1D111.9 (10)N3—C4—C5131.45 (6)
H1C—N1—H1D103.9 (13)N3—C4—C3106.58 (6)
C1—N1—H1E112.7 (9)C5—C4—C3121.96 (6)
H1C—N1—H1E110.5 (13)C2—N3—C4108.38 (6)
H1D—N1—H1E106.5 (13)C2—N3—H3125.4 (11)
N1—C1—C2112.11 (6)C4—N3—H3125.4 (11)
N1—C1—H1F108.2 (8)C6—C5—C4116.11 (7)
C2—C1—H1F108.8 (8)C6—C5—H5121.8 (8)
N1—C1—H1G108.9 (8)C4—C5—H5122.0 (8)
C2—C1—H1G108.1 (8)C5—C6—C7121.83 (7)
H1F—C1—H1G110.7 (11)C5—C6—H6118.1 (8)
N2—C2—N3109.88 (6)C7—C6—H6120.1 (8)
N2—C2—C1122.91 (6)C8—C7—C6122.04 (7)
N3—C2—C1127.10 (6)C8—C7—H7120.5 (8)
C2—N2—C3108.87 (6)C6—C7—H7117.5 (8)
C2—N2—H2124.2 (11)C7—C8—C3116.02 (6)
C3—N2—H2126.5 (11)C7—C8—H8122.2 (8)
N2—C3—C8131.71 (7)C3—C8—H8121.7 (8)
N2—C3—C4106.27 (6)H1A—O1—H1B102.8 (17)
N1—C1—C2—N2178.82 (7)C1—C2—N3—C4175.26 (7)
N1—C1—C2—N35.29 (11)C5—C4—N3—C2179.19 (8)
N3—C2—N2—C31.28 (8)C3—C4—N3—C20.44 (8)
C1—C2—N2—C3175.23 (7)N3—C4—C5—C6179.18 (7)
C2—N2—C3—C8179.35 (8)C3—C4—C5—C60.40 (11)
C2—N2—C3—C40.97 (8)C4—C5—C6—C70.60 (11)
N2—C3—C4—N30.32 (8)C5—C6—C7—C80.14 (12)
C8—C3—C4—N3179.96 (7)C6—C7—C8—C30.54 (11)
N2—C3—C4—C5179.99 (7)N2—C3—C8—C7179.61 (7)
C8—C3—C4—C50.28 (11)C4—C3—C8—C70.74 (11)
N2—C2—N3—C41.07 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1C···Cl10.84 (1)2.32 (1)3.0898 (8)152 (1)
N1—H1D···Cl2i0.83 (1)2.30 (1)3.1262 (7)177 (1)
N1—H1E···Cl2ii0.86 (1)2.41 (1)3.2430 (7)163 (1)
N2—H2···Cl20.866 (16)2.259 (16)3.1099 (6)167.2 (14)
N3—H3···O10.812 (15)1.911 (16)2.7197 (9)173.6 (15)
O1—H1A···Cl2iii0.80 (1)2.59 (1)3.3752 (7)169 (2)
O1—H1B···Cl1iv0.81 (1)2.31 (1)3.1209 (7)173 (2)
C1—H1F···Cl1v0.988 (13)2.793 (13)3.7079 (8)154.2 (10)
C5—H5···Cl1ii0.926 (13)2.960 (13)3.8515 (7)162.1 (10)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+2, y1/2, z+3/2; (ii) x, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x1, y+1/2, z1/2; (iv) x+1, y, z+1; (v) x+1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the UK EPSRC National Crystallography Service at the University of Southampton for the X-ray data collection.

Funding information

>SJK thanks Tamil Nadu State Council for Higher Education (TANSCHE) for financial support (file No. RGP/2019–20/MTWU/HECP-0080).

References

Return to citationBaskaran, M. D., Jayaraman, S., Hemamalini, M., Elsegood, M. R. J., Rajakannan, V. & Kavitha, S. J. (2025). CSD Communication (CCDC 2486341). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2pg7kz.  Google Scholar
Return to citationCescon, L. A. & Day, A. R. (1962). J. Org. Chem. 27, 581–586.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKankate, R. S., Gide, P. S. & Belsare, D. P. (2019). Arab. J. Chem. 12, 2224–2235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMalecki, J. G. (2011). CSD Communication (refcode NEPKOK). CCDC, Cambridge, England.  Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku OD (2024). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Corporation, Wroclaw, Poland.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSen, P., Kansiz, S., Dege, N., Yildiz, S. Z. & Tsapyuk, G. G. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 1517–1520.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSharma, M. C., Sharma, S., Sahu, N. K. & Kohli, D. V. (2013). J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 17, 167–176.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationStålhandske, C. (1974). Acta Cryst. B30, 1586–1589.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationTapia-Benavides, A. R., Tlahuextl, M., Tlahuext, H. & Galan-Vidal, C. (2008). Arkivoc pp. 172–5.  Google Scholar
Return to citationWu, H.-Y., Li, H., Zhu, B.-L., Wang, S.-R., Zhang, S.-M., Wu, S.-H. & Huang, W.-P. (2008). Transition Met. Chem. 33, 9–15.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146