inorganic compounds
Redetermination of ammonium metavanadate
aFacultad de Ciencias Químicas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Av. San Claudio y 18 Sur, 72570 Puebla, Pue., Mexico, and bInstituto de Física, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Av. San Claudio y 18 Sur, 72570 Puebla, Pue., Mexico
*Correspondence e-mail: sylvain_bernes@hotmail.com
The 4VO3, a compound widely used as a starting material for the synthesis of vanadium and polyoxidovanadate compounds, had been determined twice using single-crystal X-ray data [Syneček & Hanic (1954). Czech. J. Phys. 4, 120–129 (Weissenberg data); Hawthorne & Calvo (1977). J. Solid State Chem. 22, 157–170 (four-circle diffractometer data)]. Its structure is now redetermined at higher resolution using Ag Kα radiation, and the result is compared with the former refinements. Structural data for the polymeric [VO3]∞ chain remain unchanged, while more accurate parameters are obtained for the ammonium cation, improving the description of hydrogen-bonding interactions in the crystal structure.
of ammonium metavanadate, NHKeywords: crystal structure; vanadate; ammonium; high-resolution data; hydrogen bonds.
CCDC reference: 1858583
Structure description
Ammonium metavanadate, NH4VO3 [IUPAC name: ammonium trioxidovanadate(V)], is a widely used compound at the laboratory scale, for example for the preparation of V2O5, polyoxidovanadates, catalysts, or as an analytical reagent. Its has been known for a long time. The first study (Lukesh, 1950) reported the correct Pbcm, and a hypothetical arrangement for the [VO4] tetrahedra that turned out to be correct as revealed by subsequent studies. Weissenberg data allowed the determination of the atomic coordinates for all non-H atoms (Syneček & Hanic, 1954), and a least-squares using the same experimental intensities was published subsequently (Evans, 1960).
The 4VO3 is quite simple (Fig. 1). Vertice-sharing [VO4] tetrahedra form infinite [VO3]∞ chains along [001], and given that the is orthorhombic, all chains are parallel; NH4+ cations are situated in the voids between these chains. Both the tetrahedral anionic and cationic groups are sited on mirror planes parallel to (001) in Pbcm, and thus have symmetry Cs. Finally, the polymeric character of the vanadate anion stems from the special position of the O atom positioned away from the mirror plane. This atom (O3) lies on the twofold rotation axis parallel to [100].
of NHThe most precise structure report of NH4VO3 up to date is probably that by Smrčok et al. (2009), based on laboratory/synchrotron temperature-variable X-ray powder diffraction data combined with solid state DFT calculations. However, these authors commented that they made `unsuccessful attempts to grow a single-crystal suitable for single-crystal neutron diffraction'. Indeed, only one single-crystal study based on four-circle diffractometer data may be retrieved from the literature (Hawthorne & Calvo, 1977). This long-standing X-ray study reported the structure at a standard resolution, d = 0.84 Å, and, as mentioned by Smrčok et al. (2009), `the positions [of the hydrogen atoms] are not sufficiently accurate to be directly used in calculations of vibrational spectra'.
We now have redetermined the 4VO3, using room-temperature X-ray diffraction data collected at 0.61 Å resolution. As expected, the bond lengths and angles for the vanadate chain are identical, within experimental uncertainties, to those obtained from the 1977 and 2009 articles (see comparison in Table 1). However, differences occur for the ammonium moiety. Our data allowed us to rationalize the distortion of the tetrahedral coordination sphere for the cation. The short N1—H3 bond length, 0.77 (2) Å, compared to the long N1—H1 and N1—H2 bonds, 0.85 (2) Å, results from the involvement of the latter in strong hydrogen bonds, while the former gives much weaker and bifurcated hydrogen bonds (Table 2). In the same way, the largest H—N—H angle, 116 (4)°, involves H atoms participating in weak hydrogen bonds, while the acute angle of 104 (2)° is H1—N—H2, where H1 and H2 are engaged in stronger hydrogen bonds. The framework of hydrogen bonds is, however, essentially identical in the three structure determinations. Each cation in the crystal interacts with four symmetry-related [VO4] tetrahedra, forming two strong and two weak hydrogen bonds (Table 2). Weak contacts with H3 as donor form R22(6) ring motifs with the vanadate chains. Such rings connect the cation with two vertices of a [VO4] tetrahedron, and the same donor groups are connected to the neighbouring vanadate chain in the crystal, forming larger R22(10) ring motifs (Fig. 2). Strong contacts with H1/H2 as donors also connect neighbouring chains. The strength of the hydrogen bonds is reflected in the displacement parameters for the ammonium H atoms: H3 refines with the highest displacement parameter, Uiso = 0.069 (6) Å2, because it is not stabilized on its site through a strong interaction with the vanadate chain. Smrčok et al. (2009) included in their description two additional very bent contacts. However, the N—H⋯O angles are then below 110°, and these contacts should thus contribute to the crystal stabilization with an energy approaching 0 kJ mol−1 (Wood et al., 2009).
of NHSynthesis and crystallization
Warning! Ammonium metavanadate is a hazardous material classified with health code 4 in the NFPA 704 standard system: very short exposure could cause death or major residual injury. The single crystal used in the present study was harvested as a recrystallized unreacted material from the crude reaction in which we attempted to obtain a VIV derivative of tris(metforminium)2+ decavanadate (Treviño et al., 2015), using acetylsalicylic acid both as a source of protons and as a reducing agent. Typically, metformin hydrochloride (0.850 g), aspirin (0.5 g) and NH4VO3 (0.5 g) were stirred at room temperature for one hour, and the remaining solids were filtered off by gravity. Good-quality single crystals of the main product (orange crystals; Sánchez-Lombardo et al., 2014) and NH4VO3 (colourless crystals) were obtained by fractional crystallization, allowing the solvent to evaporate under ambient conditions.
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . The three H atoms in the were refined with free coordinates and free isotropic displacement parameters.
details are summarized in Table 3
|
Structural data
CCDC reference: 1858583
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314618010805/wm4083sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314618010805/wm4083Isup2.hkl
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2018); cell
X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2018); data reduction: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2018); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008) and CaRIne Crystallography (Boudias & Monceau, 1998); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).NH4+·VO3− | Dx = 2.307 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 116.98 | Ag Kα radiation, λ = 0.56083 Å |
Orthorhombic, Pbcm | Cell parameters from 39692 reflections |
a = 4.9045 (3) Å | θ = 2.7–33.0° |
b = 11.7945 (5) Å | µ = 1.41 mm−1 |
c = 5.8231 (2) Å | T = 295 K |
V = 336.84 (3) Å3 | Prism, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.32 × 0.09 × 0.09 mm |
F(000) = 232 |
Stoe Stadivari diffractometer | 846 independent reflections |
Radiation source: Sealed X-ray tube, Axo Astix-f Microfocus source | 754 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graded multilayer mirror monochromator | Rint = 0.027 |
Detector resolution: 5.81 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3° |
ω scans | h = −8→8 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (X-AREA; Stoe & Cie, 2018) | k = −19→19 |
Tmin = 0.295, Tmax = 0.656 | l = −9→8 |
17208 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | 0 constraints |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.014 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.042 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0248P)2 + 0.023P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.13 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
846 reflections | Δρmax = 0.33 e Å−3 |
40 parameters | Δρmin = −0.35 e Å−3 |
0 restraints |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.9355 (2) | 0.41286 (10) | 0.250000 | 0.0254 (2) | |
H1 | 0.796 (5) | 0.4562 (18) | 0.250000 | 0.047 (6)* | |
H2 | 1.071 (4) | 0.4581 (16) | 0.250000 | 0.023 (5)* | |
H3 | 0.947 (3) | 0.379 (2) | 0.137 (4) | 0.069 (6)* | |
V1 | 0.46440 (4) | 0.17437 (2) | 0.250000 | 0.01270 (5) | |
O1 | 0.1305 (2) | 0.16927 (8) | 0.250000 | 0.02460 (18) | |
O2 | 0.57698 (19) | 0.04220 (7) | 0.250000 | 0.02260 (17) | |
O3 | 0.58198 (18) | 0.250000 | 0.000000 | 0.02029 (16) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0219 (5) | 0.0176 (4) | 0.0366 (6) | −0.0022 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
V1 | 0.01423 (9) | 0.01304 (8) | 0.01082 (7) | −0.00023 (6) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0158 (4) | 0.0255 (4) | 0.0324 (5) | 0.0002 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O2 | 0.0227 (4) | 0.0160 (4) | 0.0291 (4) | 0.0031 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O3 | 0.0235 (4) | 0.0236 (4) | 0.0139 (3) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0050 (3) |
N1—H1 | 0.85 (2) | V1—O1 | 1.6388 (10) |
N1—H2 | 0.85 (2) | V1—O2 | 1.6538 (9) |
N1—H3 | 0.77 (2) | V1—O3 | 1.8021 (3) |
N1—H3i | 0.77 (2) | V1—O3i | 1.8021 (3) |
H1—N1—H2 | 104 (2) | O1—V1—O3 | 109.75 (3) |
H1—N1—H3 | 111.7 (15) | O2—V1—O3 | 111.08 (2) |
H2—N1—H3 | 105.8 (15) | O1—V1—O3i | 109.75 (3) |
H1—N1—H3i | 111.7 (15) | O2—V1—O3i | 111.08 (2) |
H2—N1—H3i | 105.8 (15) | O3—V1—O3i | 107.77 (3) |
H3—N1—H3i | 116 (4) | V1—O3—V1ii | 142.68 (5) |
O1—V1—O2 | 107.40 (5) | ||
O1—V1—O3—V1ii | 1.91 (3) | O3i—V1—O3—V1ii | −117.57 (3) |
O2—V1—O3—V1ii | 120.53 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···O2iii | 0.85 (2) | 2.09 (3) | 2.9400 (16) | 172 (2) |
N1—H2···O2iv | 0.85 (2) | 1.99 (2) | 2.8364 (15) | 171 (2) |
N1—H3···O3 | 0.77 (2) | 2.48 (2) | 2.9690 (12) | 122.9 (17) |
N1—H3···O1v | 0.77 (2) | 2.49 (2) | 3.2141 (7) | 156 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (v) x+1, −y+1/2, z−1/2. |
The labelling scheme for atomic sites is identical in the three studies. |
1977 studya | 2009 studyb | This work | |
Vanadate anion | |||
V1—O1 | 1.640 (4) | 1.655 | 1.6388 (10) |
V1—O2 | 1.647 (4) | 1.679 | 1.6538 (9) |
V1—O3 (×2) | 1.803 (1) | 1.808 | 1.8021 (3) |
O1—V1—O2 | 107.3 (1) | 107.2 | 107.40 (5) |
O1—V1—O3 (×2) | 109.7 (1) | 109.0 | 109.75 (3) |
O2—V1—O3 (×2) | 111.1 (1) | 112.1 | 111.08 (2) |
O3—V1—O3 | 107.9 (1) | 107.2 | 107.77 (3) |
Ammonium cation | |||
N1—H1 | 0.82 (8) | 1.05 | 0.85 (2) |
N1—H2 | 0.94 (8) | 1.05 | 0.85 (2) |
N1—H3 (×2) | 0.97 (5) | 1.04 | 0.77 (2) |
H1—N1—H2 | 111 (6) | 112 | 104 (2) |
H1—N1—H3 (×2) | 106 (3) | 109 | 111.7 (15) |
H2—N1—H3 (×2) | 107 (3) | 110 | 105.8 (15) |
H3—N1—H3 | 119 (5) | 108 | 116 (4) |
References: (a) Hawthorne & Calvo (1977); (b) Smrčok et al. (2009), with DFT-optimized parameters rounded to the precision of the experimentally determined values. |
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (grant No. 100500599-VIEP2018; grant No. 100142933-VIEP2018); Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (grant No. 268178).
References
Boudias, C. & Monceau, D. (1998). CaRIne Crystallography. Divergent S. A., Compiègne, France. Google Scholar
Evans, H. T. (1960). Z. Kristallogr. 114, 257–277. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F. C. & Calvo, C. (1977). J. Solid State Chem. 22, 157–170. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Lukesh, J. S. (1950). Acta Cryst. 3, 476–477. CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sánchez-Lombardo, I., Sánchez-Lara, E., Pérez-Benítez, A., Mendoza, Á., Bernès, S. & González-Vergara, E. (2014). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 4581–4588. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Smrčok, Ľ., Bitschnau, B. & Filinchuk, Y. (2009). Cryst. Res. Technol. 44, 978–984. Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2018). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Syneček, V. & Hanic, F. (1954). Czech. J. Phys. 4, 120–129. Google Scholar
Treviño, S., Sánchez-Lara, E., Sarmiento-Ortega, V. E., Sánchez-Lombardo, I., Flores-Hernández, J. Á., Pérez-Benítez, A., Brambila-Colombres, E. & González-Vergara, E. (2015). J. Inorg. Biochem. 147, 85–92. Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wood, P. A., Allen, F. H. & Pidcock, E. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 1563–1571. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.