organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

1-Naphthamide

crossmark logo

aEnvironmental, Molecular and Structural Chemistry Research Unit, University of Constantine-1, 25000, Constantine, Algeria, bLaboratoire de Technologie des Matériaux Avancés, Ecole Nationale, Polytechnique, de Constantine, Algeria, and cCRM2, UMR CNRS 7036, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, Université de Lorraine, Institut Jean Barriol, BP 70239, 54506 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 2 September 2026; accepted 23 September 2026; online 30 September 2026)

In the title compound, C11H9NO, the dihedral angle between the naphthalene fused-ring system and the amide group is 42.18 (9)°. In the crystal, N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into (100) sheets. No significant aromatic π–π stacking is observed.

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

The title compound (I), with mol­ecular formula C11H9NO, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c. The asymmetric unit contains one mol­ecule in which the dihedral angle between the C2–C11 fused ring system (r.m.s. deviation = 0.008 Å) and the C1/N1/O1 amide moiety is 42.18 (9)° (Fig. 1[link]). The significant twist probably arises to minimize steric crowding. The geometrical parameters for the amide group [C1—N1 = 1.3249 (19) Å, C1—O1 = 1.245 (2) Å and angles O1—C1—N1, O1—C1—C2 and N1—C1—C2 close to 120°) support a conjugated amide system, as expected. A short intra­molecular C4—H4⋯O1 contact occurs.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

In the extended structure of (I), the crystal cohesion is dominated by N11—H1A⋯O1 and N1—H1B⋯O1 hydrogen bonds (Table 1[link]). The former generate inversion dimers and the latter link the dimers into (100) sheets (Fig. 2[link] and Table 1[link]). The separations between the aromatic ring planes [shortest centroid–centroid separation = 4.799 (4) Å] are too large to support significant aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
C4—H4⋯O1 0.93 2.38 2.969 (3) 121
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.86 2.10 2.951 (3) 170
N1—H1B⋯O1ii 0.86 2.06 2.889 (3) 163
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The packing in (I) with hydrogen bonds shown as black dashed lines.

Hirshfeld surface analysis and the associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots were used to qu­antify the inter­molecular contacts in the crystal of (I) (Fig. 3[link]). The fingerprint plots show that H⋯H contacts make the largest contribution (42.2%), followed closely by C⋯H/H⋯C contacts (40.2%). The O⋯H/H⋯O contacts account for 14.20%, while all other contributions are less than 2.0%. These results show that the cohesion of the crystal is primarily governed by van der Waals contacts, with aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions not playing a significant role in establishing the supra­molecular architecture.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Hirshfeld surfaces of (I) mapped over dnorm, shown as front and back views.

For the related structure of 9-anthramide, see Heller & Schmidt (1971View full citation).

Synthesis and crystallization

1-Naphthamide was obtained by aqueous hydrolysis of 1-naphtho­nitrile under heating. The starting nitrile was suspended in water and the mixture was heated until complete conversion to the amide was achieved. Colourless blocks of (I) were grown by slow evaporation of an aqueous solution of the compound at room temperature.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link].

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C11H9NO
Mr 171.19
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 293
a, b, c (Å) 14.787 (5), 6.053 (5), 9.954 (5)
β (°) 90.448 (5)
V (Å3) 890.9 (9)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.08
Crystal size (mm) 0.14 × 0.13 × 0.11
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.753, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 5594, 2584, 1535
Rint 0.075
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.704
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.071, 0.207, 1.05
No. of reflections 2584
No. of parameters 118
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.22, −0.27
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2015View full citation), OLEX2.solve 1.5 (Bourhis et al., 2015View full citation), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015View full citation) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

Naphthalene-1-carboxamide top
Crystal data top
C11H9NOF(000) = 360
Mr = 171.19Dx = 1.276 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 14.787 (5) ÅCell parameters from 2494 reflections
b = 6.053 (5) Åθ = 2.5–35.6°
c = 9.954 (5) ŵ = 0.08 mm−1
β = 90.448 (5)°T = 293 K
V = 890.9 (9) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.14 × 0.13 × 0.11 mm
Data collection top
Saxi-CrysAlisPro-abstract goniometer imported SAXI images
diffractometer
2584 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source1535 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.075
ω scansθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2015)
h = −9→20
Tmin = 0.753, Tmax = 1.000k = −8→5
5594 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.071H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.207 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.106P)2 + 0.0779P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2584 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.22 e Å−3
118 parametersΔρmin = −0.27 e Å−3
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. The H atoms were placed geometrically (N—H = 0.86 Å, C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined as riding atoms.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.92484 (9)0.3228 (2)0.10353 (11)0.0589 (4)
C110.84713 (15)−0.1053 (3)−0.10734 (18)0.0600 (5)
H110.9018−0.1167−0.15240.072*
C20.83223 (12)0.0721 (3)−0.02377 (15)0.0456 (4)
C10.90457 (11)0.2427 (3)−0.00788 (15)0.0472 (4)
C30.74867 (11)0.0887 (3)0.04678 (15)0.0439 (4)
C40.72663 (12)0.2652 (3)0.13314 (17)0.0509 (4)
H40.76840.37800.14700.061*
C80.68255 (13)−0.0809 (3)0.02734 (19)0.0550 (5)
C70.59888 (15)−0.0640 (4)0.0951 (2)0.0721 (6)
H70.5555−0.17350.08270.086*
C90.70104 (17)−0.2580 (3)−0.0600 (2)0.0681 (6)
H90.6579−0.3681−0.07250.082*
C50.64530 (15)0.2736 (4)0.1967 (2)0.0659 (6)
H50.63260.39120.25370.079*
C100.78034 (18)−0.2706 (3)−0.1257 (2)0.0701 (6)
H100.7912−0.3884−0.18330.084*
C60.58088 (15)0.1078 (5)0.1774 (2)0.0772 (7)
H60.52560.11560.22100.093*
N10.94732 (11)0.3035 (3)−0.11836 (13)0.0605 (5)
H1A0.99000.3999−0.11390.073*
H1B0.93240.2465−0.19450.073*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0605 (8)0.0885 (10)0.0276 (6)−0.0165 (7)0.0030 (5)−0.0033 (6)
C110.0731 (13)0.0653 (12)0.0416 (9)0.0114 (10)0.0017 (8)−0.0031 (8)
C20.0543 (10)0.0526 (10)0.0299 (7)0.0032 (7)−0.0019 (6)0.0028 (7)
C10.0478 (9)0.0653 (11)0.0285 (7)0.0027 (7)0.0025 (6)0.0008 (7)
C30.0499 (9)0.0482 (9)0.0335 (7)−0.0009 (7)−0.0040 (6)0.0066 (6)
C40.0527 (10)0.0581 (10)0.0418 (9)−0.0015 (8)0.0036 (7)0.0006 (7)
C80.0630 (11)0.0545 (10)0.0472 (9)−0.0073 (8)−0.0089 (8)0.0095 (8)
C70.0613 (13)0.0844 (15)0.0703 (14)−0.0239 (11)−0.0050 (10)0.0150 (12)
C90.0880 (16)0.0549 (12)0.0612 (13)−0.0146 (10)−0.0138 (11)0.0033 (9)
C50.0580 (11)0.0825 (14)0.0572 (12)0.0048 (10)0.0090 (9)−0.0071 (10)
C100.1031 (18)0.0500 (11)0.0572 (12)0.0029 (11)−0.0113 (12)−0.0088 (9)
C60.0538 (12)0.1050 (18)0.0730 (15)−0.0059 (12)0.0124 (10)0.0030 (13)
N10.0655 (10)0.0879 (11)0.0281 (7)−0.0179 (8)0.0101 (6)−0.0073 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.245 (2)C8—C91.408 (3)
C11—H110.9300C7—H70.9300
C11—C21.377 (3)C7—C61.352 (3)
C11—C101.417 (3)C9—H90.9300
C2—C11.495 (3)C9—C101.349 (3)
C2—C31.430 (2)C5—H50.9300
C1—N11.3249 (19)C5—C61.396 (3)
C3—C41.411 (2)C10—H100.9300
C3—C81.430 (3)C6—H60.9300
C4—H40.9300N1—H1A0.8600
C4—C51.364 (3)N1—H1B0.8600
C8—C71.417 (3)
C2—C11—H11119.5C8—C7—H7119.3
C2—C11—C10120.9 (2)C6—C7—C8121.37 (19)
C10—C11—H11119.5C6—C7—H7119.3
C11—C2—C1119.01 (17)C8—C9—H9119.5
C11—C2—C3119.67 (17)C10—C9—C8121.05 (19)
C3—C2—C1121.32 (15)C10—C9—H9119.5
O1—C1—C2122.04 (14)C4—C5—H5119.6
O1—C1—N1121.23 (17)C4—C5—C6120.8 (2)
N1—C1—C2116.73 (14)C6—C5—H5119.6
C2—C3—C8118.39 (16)C11—C10—H10119.8
C4—C3—C2123.88 (15)C9—C10—C11120.35 (19)
C4—C3—C8117.72 (17)C9—C10—H10119.8
C3—C4—H4119.3C7—C6—C5120.0 (2)
C5—C4—C3121.30 (18)C7—C6—H6120.0
C5—C4—H4119.3C5—C6—H6120.0
C7—C8—C3118.83 (18)C1—N1—H1A120.0
C9—C8—C3119.63 (19)C1—N1—H1B120.0
C9—C8—C7121.54 (19)H1A—N1—H1B120.0
C11—C2—C1—O1−137.42 (18)C3—C8—C7—C6−0.2 (3)
C11—C2—C1—N141.7 (2)C3—C8—C9—C100.1 (3)
C11—C2—C3—C4−179.15 (16)C4—C3—C8—C70.0 (2)
C11—C2—C3—C8−0.3 (2)C4—C3—C8—C9178.83 (16)
C2—C11—C10—C9−0.7 (3)C4—C5—C6—C70.2 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5179.25 (17)C8—C3—C4—C50.4 (3)
C2—C3—C8—C7−178.98 (16)C8—C7—C6—C50.1 (4)
C2—C3—C8—C9−0.1 (2)C8—C9—C10—C110.3 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C41.4 (2)C7—C8—C9—C10178.9 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C8−179.74 (15)C9—C8—C7—C6−179.1 (2)
C3—C2—C1—O142.0 (2)C10—C11—C2—C1−179.83 (17)
C3—C2—C1—N1−138.82 (17)C10—C11—C2—C30.7 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.5 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C4—H4···O10.932.382.969 (3)121
N1—H1A···O1i0.862.102.951 (3)170
N1—H1B···O1ii0.862.062.889 (3)163
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center (CCDC) for access to the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) through the FAIRE program.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Unité de recherche de chimie de l'environnement, moléculaire et structurale UR.CHEMS; DRSDT-Algeria; Laboratoire de technologie des matériaux avancés, Ecole Nationale Polytechnique de Constantine, Algeria.

References

Return to citationBourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 59–75.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHeller, E. & Schmidt, G. M. J. (1971). Isr. J. Chem. 9, 449–462.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRigaku OD (2015). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146