organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146

(E)-N-(4-Bromo­phen­yl)-1-(quinolin-2-yl)methanimine

crossmark logo

aSchool of Agriculture and Science, Discipline of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa, and bDepartment of Chemical Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, PMB 2001, Nigeria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by M. Bolte, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Germany (Received 26 August 2026; accepted 28 August 2026; online 3 September 2026)

The title compound, C16H11BrN2, is a Schiff base formed through the condensation reaction of 2-quinoline­carboxaldehyde with 4-bromo­aniline. The C=N bond length of 1.282 (2) Å is consistent with its double-bond character. The imine linkage adopts the E configuration, as indicated by the N—C—C—N torsion angle of 174.27 (14)°. This value also demonstrates that the quinoline ring and imine group are arranged in an almost coplanar manner. In contrast, the 4-bromo­phenyl ring is significantly twisted relative to the imine-quinoline plane, as indicated by the C—N—C—C torsion angle of approximately 46.8 (2)°. Inter­molecular C—H⋯π inter­actions between quinolinyl and bromo­phenyl rings form a three-dimensional supra­molecular network in the crystal packing.

3D view (loading...)
[Scheme 3D1]
Chemical scheme
[Scheme 1]

Structure description

Schiff base compounds derived from aromatic aldehydes and primary amines constitute an important class of organic ligands that have been extensively investigated owing to their ease of preparation, structural versatility, and broad biological and pharmacological profiles, including anti­bacterial, anti­fungal, and anti­cancer activities (Boulechfar et al., 2023View full citation; Adeleke et al., 2022View full citation). Among the various aldehyde building blocks employed, quinoline­carboxaldehyde is of particular inter­est because it incorporates the quinoline pharmacophore, a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry known for its activity against a wide range of pathogens and tumour cell lines (Solomon et al., 2011View full citation). The resulting quinoline-derived Schiff bases combine the chelating and biological potential of the quinoline unit with the donor flexibility of the imine nitro­gen, rendering them attractive precursors for metal-complex synthesis and functional material applications (Sonawane et al., 2023View full citation).

The asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of a single, neutral mol­ecule of (E)-N-(4-bromo­phen­yl)-1-(quinolin-2-yl)methanimine. The mol­ecule comprises a quinoline ring system connected at its 2-position to a methanimine (–CH=N–) bridge, which in turn links to a 4-bromo­phenyl ring at the imine nitro­gen (Fig. 1[link]). The quinoline ring system and the imine fragment are coplanar, as the torsion angles within the quinoline ring confirm near-perfect planarity of this moiety, and the imine carbon lies in this plane, as reflected by the torsion of −2.9 (2)°. In contrast, the 4-bromo­phenyl ring is significantly twisted with respect to the quinoline–imine plane, as shown by the torsion angle C10—N2—C11—C12 of 46.8 (2)°. Other intra­molecular bond parameters are comparable to closely related quinoline-based Schiff bases reported in the literature (Oladipo et al., 2025View full citation; Wang et al.. 2017aView full citation,bView full citation; Faizi et al., 2015View full citation). The crystal packing of the title compound features C–H⋯π inter­actions between the quinolinyl and bromo­phenyl rings of neighbouring mol­ecules, forming a three-dimensional supra­molecular network. (Table 1[link], Fig. 2[link]).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1, Cg2 and Cg3 are the centroids of the N1/C5–C9, C1–C6 and C11–C16 rings, respectively.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C1—H1⋯Cg3i 0.95 2.67 3.3703 (16) 131
C4—H4⋯Cg2ii 0.95 2.79 3.4808 (17) 130
C7—H7⋯Cg1ii 0.95 2.85 3.5026 (16) 127
C13—H13⋯Cg3iii 0.95 2.69 3.4042 (16) 132
C16—H16⋯Cg2iv 0.95 2.70 3.3932 (15) 131
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of the title compound shown with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Representation of the C—H⋯π hydrogen bonds in the crystal structure of the title compound (dashed orange lines).

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was synthesized by the condensation reaction of an equimolar amount of 2-quinoline­carboxaldehyde with 4-bromo­aniline in methanol, with a catalytic amount of glacial acetic acid. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 80°C for 4 h, during which time a yellow precipitate was formed. The solid product was isolated by filtration, washed with cold ethanol, and dried in air (Adeleke et al., 2021View full citation). Single crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of the concentrated solution of the product in ethanol at room temperature.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link].

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C16H11BrN2
Mr 311.18
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 100
a, b, c (Å) 15.3817 (4), 13.9338 (4), 6.0050 (2)
β (°) 91.654 (1)
V3) 1286.49 (7)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 4.23
Crystal size (mm) 0.42 × 0.33 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.545, 0.753
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 19912, 2346, 2224
Rint 0.040
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.602
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.023, 0.062, 1.05
No. of reflections 2346
No. of parameters 172
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.22, −0.45
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2009View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 1.5 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Structural data


Computing details top

(E)-N-(4-Bromophenyl)-1-(quinolin-2-yl)methanimine top
Crystal data top
C16H11BrN2F(000) = 624
Mr = 311.18Dx = 1.607 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 15.3817 (4) ÅCell parameters from 9977 reflections
b = 13.9338 (4) Åθ = 2.9–68.1°
c = 6.0050 (2) ŵ = 4.23 mm1
β = 91.654 (1)°T = 100 K
V = 1286.49 (7) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.42 × 0.33 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2346 independent reflections
Radiation source: microfocus sealed X-ray tube, Incoatec Iµs2224 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror optics monochromatorRint = 0.040
Detector resolution: 7.9 pixels mm-1θmax = 68.1°, θmin = 2.9°
φ and ω scansh = 1817
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) wR2(int) was 0.1018 before and 0.0553 after correction. The ratio of minimum to maximum transmission is 0.7237. The λ/2 correction factor is 0.0015.
k = 1616
Tmin = 0.545, Tmax = 0.753l = 67
19912 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.062 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0377P)2 + 0.4867P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2346 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
172 parametersΔρmin = 0.45 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Hydrogen atoms were located in a difference map and refined as riding on their parent atom with U(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and with C—H = 0.95 Å.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.03190 (2)0.63813 (2)1.15570 (3)0.02712 (9)
N10.59463 (8)0.58283 (8)0.7717 (2)0.0175 (3)
N20.37000 (9)0.61932 (9)0.6575 (2)0.0185 (3)
C130.21335 (10)0.66459 (10)1.1058 (3)0.0187 (3)
H130.2116840.6922631.2501600.022*
C70.60856 (10)0.65857 (10)0.3381 (3)0.0194 (3)
H70.6126420.6826440.1908000.023*
C50.68526 (11)0.64033 (9)0.4694 (3)0.0176 (3)
C80.52919 (11)0.64130 (9)0.4251 (3)0.0197 (3)
H80.4773970.6534640.3397210.024*
C40.76976 (11)0.66208 (11)0.3979 (3)0.0204 (3)
H40.7772390.6893390.2547160.024*
C10.74967 (10)0.58019 (10)0.8203 (3)0.0187 (3)
H10.7435550.5514060.9624030.022*
C60.67467 (10)0.60071 (10)0.6855 (2)0.0167 (3)
C140.13806 (11)0.62969 (10)1.0021 (3)0.0187 (3)
C100.44132 (10)0.59306 (10)0.7552 (2)0.0187 (3)
H100.4400700.5657130.9000390.022*
C110.29350 (10)0.61891 (10)0.7815 (3)0.0173 (3)
C90.52518 (9)0.60476 (11)0.6458 (2)0.0172 (3)
C120.29111 (10)0.65845 (10)0.9953 (3)0.0183 (3)
H120.3432280.6813211.0654950.022*
C160.21614 (10)0.58570 (10)0.6789 (2)0.0186 (3)
H160.2170730.5600890.5323720.022*
C150.13827 (10)0.58990 (10)0.7894 (3)0.0199 (3)
H150.0860930.5660780.7213220.024*
C30.84113 (11)0.64401 (10)0.5343 (3)0.0217 (3)
H30.8976160.6599730.4861270.026*
C20.83087 (10)0.60168 (11)0.7465 (3)0.0212 (3)
H20.8806810.5880950.8383520.025*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.01970 (13)0.03373 (14)0.02817 (13)0.00120 (6)0.00494 (8)0.00493 (6)
N10.0213 (6)0.0120 (6)0.0193 (6)0.0004 (5)0.0011 (5)0.0001 (5)
N20.0214 (7)0.0127 (5)0.0214 (6)0.0001 (5)0.0009 (5)0.0005 (5)
C130.0238 (8)0.0124 (6)0.0196 (7)0.0003 (6)0.0003 (6)0.0003 (6)
C70.0270 (8)0.0133 (6)0.0180 (7)0.0010 (6)0.0005 (6)0.0003 (6)
C50.0239 (8)0.0103 (7)0.0187 (8)0.0004 (5)0.0019 (6)0.0023 (5)
C80.0229 (8)0.0147 (7)0.0212 (8)0.0002 (5)0.0024 (6)0.0000 (5)
C40.0268 (8)0.0136 (6)0.0211 (8)0.0023 (6)0.0053 (6)0.0021 (6)
C10.0233 (8)0.0126 (6)0.0203 (7)0.0007 (5)0.0001 (6)0.0008 (5)
C60.0202 (7)0.0101 (6)0.0198 (7)0.0003 (5)0.0020 (6)0.0017 (5)
C140.0184 (8)0.0154 (7)0.0224 (8)0.0017 (5)0.0037 (6)0.0013 (6)
C100.0224 (8)0.0130 (7)0.0207 (7)0.0002 (5)0.0011 (6)0.0004 (6)
C110.0208 (8)0.0107 (6)0.0204 (7)0.0018 (5)0.0002 (6)0.0028 (6)
C90.0199 (8)0.0109 (7)0.0208 (8)0.0001 (5)0.0001 (6)0.0012 (5)
C120.0207 (8)0.0123 (6)0.0218 (8)0.0005 (6)0.0032 (6)0.0003 (6)
C160.0239 (8)0.0130 (6)0.0188 (7)0.0006 (5)0.0007 (6)0.0008 (5)
C150.0200 (8)0.0166 (7)0.0231 (8)0.0019 (6)0.0027 (6)0.0002 (6)
C30.0227 (8)0.0158 (7)0.0268 (8)0.0027 (5)0.0047 (7)0.0042 (6)
C20.0200 (8)0.0162 (7)0.0271 (8)0.0010 (6)0.0022 (6)0.0041 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—C141.9021 (16)C4—C31.374 (2)
N1—C61.372 (2)C1—H10.9500
N1—C91.3264 (19)C1—C61.419 (2)
N2—C101.282 (2)C1—C21.370 (2)
N2—C111.411 (2)C14—C151.392 (2)
C13—H130.9500C10—H100.9500
C13—C141.387 (2)C10—C91.474 (2)
C13—C121.387 (2)C11—C121.399 (2)
C7—H70.9500C11—C161.403 (2)
C7—C51.423 (2)C12—H120.9500
C7—C81.363 (2)C16—H160.9500
C5—C41.413 (2)C16—C151.387 (2)
C5—C61.423 (2)C15—H150.9500
C8—H80.9500C3—H30.9500
C8—C91.423 (2)C3—C21.417 (2)
C4—H40.9500C2—H20.9500
C9—N1—C6117.37 (13)C15—C14—Br1119.61 (12)
C10—N2—C11118.23 (13)N2—C10—H10119.6
C14—C13—H13120.5N2—C10—C9120.83 (14)
C14—C13—C12118.95 (14)C9—C10—H10119.6
C12—C13—H13120.5C12—C11—N2121.82 (14)
C5—C7—H7120.2C12—C11—C16119.25 (15)
C8—C7—H7120.2C16—C11—N2118.67 (14)
C8—C7—C5119.59 (14)N1—C9—C8123.88 (14)
C7—C5—C6117.34 (15)N1—C9—C10114.92 (13)
C4—C5—C7123.26 (15)C8—C9—C10121.14 (13)
C4—C5—C6119.37 (15)C13—C12—C11120.61 (14)
C7—C8—H8120.5C13—C12—H12119.7
C7—C8—C9118.90 (14)C11—C12—H12119.7
C9—C8—H8120.5C11—C16—H16119.7
C5—C4—H4119.8C15—C16—C11120.62 (14)
C3—C4—C5120.37 (15)C15—C16—H16119.7
C3—C4—H4119.8C14—C15—H15120.6
C6—C1—H1119.8C16—C15—C14118.72 (14)
C2—C1—H1119.8C16—C15—H15120.6
C2—C1—C6120.33 (14)C4—C3—H3119.8
N1—C6—C5122.81 (14)C4—C3—C2120.30 (16)
N1—C6—C1118.13 (13)C2—C3—H3119.8
C1—C6—C5119.05 (14)C1—C2—C3120.52 (15)
C13—C14—Br1118.56 (12)C1—C2—H2119.7
C13—C14—C15121.83 (15)C3—C2—H2119.7
Br1—C14—C15—C16179.06 (11)C6—N1—C9—C82.9 (2)
N2—C10—C9—N1174.27 (14)C6—N1—C9—C10174.18 (12)
N2—C10—C9—C82.9 (2)C6—C5—C4—C30.8 (2)
N2—C11—C12—C13174.38 (13)C6—C1—C2—C30.4 (2)
N2—C11—C16—C15175.74 (13)C14—C13—C12—C110.9 (2)
C13—C14—C15—C160.3 (2)C10—N2—C11—C1246.8 (2)
C7—C5—C4—C3178.98 (13)C10—N2—C11—C16139.02 (14)
C7—C5—C6—N12.1 (2)C11—N2—C10—C9171.29 (13)
C7—C5—C6—C1179.09 (13)C11—C16—C15—C141.4 (2)
C7—C8—C9—N12.5 (2)C9—N1—C6—C50.6 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C10174.41 (13)C9—N1—C6—C1178.28 (13)
C5—C7—C8—C90.3 (2)C12—C13—C14—Br1179.79 (11)
C5—C4—C3—C21.2 (2)C12—C13—C14—C150.8 (2)
C8—C7—C5—C4175.72 (14)C12—C11—C16—C151.4 (2)
C8—C7—C5—C62.5 (2)C16—C11—C12—C130.3 (2)
C4—C5—C6—N1176.16 (13)C2—C1—C6—N1176.41 (13)
C4—C5—C6—C12.7 (2)C2—C1—C6—C52.5 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C11.4 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg1, Cg2 and Cg3 are the centroids of the N1/C5–C9, C1–C6 and C11–C16 rings, respectively.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1···Cg3i0.952.673.3703 (16)131
C4—H4···Cg2ii0.952.793.4808 (17)130
C7—H7···Cg1ii0.952.853.5026 (16)127
C13—H13···Cg3iii0.952.693.4042 (16)132
C16—H16···Cg2iv0.952.703.3932 (15)131
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+2; (ii) x, y+1/2, z3/2; (iii) x, y+1/2, z1/2; (iv) x+1, y+1, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the University of KwaZulu-Natal for providing access to X-ray diffraction facilities.

References

Return to citationAdeleke, A. A., Zamisa, S. J., Islam, M. S., Olofinsan, K., Salau, V. F., Mocktar, C. & Omondi, B. (2021). Molecules 26, 1205.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationAdeleke, A. A., Zamisa, S. J., Islam, M. S., Olofinsan, K., Salau, V. F., Mocktar, C. & Omondi, B. (2022). Biometals 35, 363–394.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBoulechfar, C., Ferkous, H., Delimi, A., Djedouani, A., Kahlouche, A., Boublia, A., Darwish, A. S., Lemaoui, T., Verma, R. & Benguerba, Y. (2023). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 150, 110451.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationFaizi, M. S. H., Siddiqui, N. & Javed, S. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, o49–o50.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationOladipo, S. D., Luckay, R. C., Olalekan, S. O., Badeji, A. A., Matinise, N. & Tshikhudo, F. (2025). ACS Omega 10, 26500–26519.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSolomon, V. R. & Lee, H. (2011). Curr. Med. Chem. 18, 1488–1508.  Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSonawane, H. R., Vibhute, B. T., Aghav, B. D., Deore, J. V. & Patil, S. K. (2023). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 258, 115549.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationWang, A., Fan, R., Dong, Y., Chen, W., Song, Y., Wang, P., Hao, S., Liu, Z. & Yang, Y. (2017a). Dalton Trans. 46, 71–85.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWang, A., Fan, R., Dong, Y., Song, Y., Zhou, Y., Zheng, J., Du, X., Xing, K. & Yang, Y. (2017b). Appl. Mater. & Interfaces 9, 15744–15757.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoIUCrDATA
ISSN: 2414-3146