organic compounds
rac-2-{3-[1-(Acetyloxy)ethyl]-2,2-dimethylcyclobutyl}acetic acid
aUniversity of Mainz, Department of Chemistry, Duesbergweg 10-14, 55099 Mainz, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: detert@uni-mainz.de
The title compound, C12H20O4, was prepared from α-pinene in three steps. The ester and acid moieties are cis on the slightly folded cyclobutane ring. In the crystal, carboxylic acid bound dimers form layers parallel to (202).
Keywords: crystal structure; cyclobutane; strain.
CCDC reference: 2405160
Structure description
As part of a project on strained carbocycles (Detert & Schollmeyer, 2017; Herges et al., 2005), the title compound, C12H20O4 (Fig. 1), was prepared from racemic α-pinene by permanganate oxidation, borohydride reduction of the pinonic acid to pinolic acid and acetylation. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c with the containing eight molecules. Two enantiomeric molecules are connected via two hydrogen bridges of the carboxylic acids, forming centrosymmetric dimers. The distance between the oxygen atoms forming the hydrogen bond is 2.6547 (13) Å. These dimers are arranged in layers parallel to the (02) plane (Table 1, Fig. 2). The central cyclobutane ring is folded in a butterfly-like manner: the planes defined by C1,C2,C4 and by C2, C3, C4 subtend an angle of 24.61 (12)°, which is due to the bulky methyl groups at C2. However, it is significantly smaller than the ideal angle of 35° (Bucourt, 1974). The acetic acid substituent on C1 and the acetoxyethyl on C3 are cis and on the open side of the folded cyclobutane. The geminal methyl groups on C2 open an angle of 110.39 (10)° and provoke an elongation of the cyclobutane bond lengths e.g. C1—C2 = 1.5697 (15) Å versus C1—C4 = 1.5467 (15) Å. A deviation of only 0.0193 (10) Å for O8 destroys the otherwise perfect planarity of the acetic acid unit O7,O8,C5,C6.
Synthesis and crystallization
The title compound was prepared from α-pinene by phase-transfer-catalyzed oxidation with permanganate according to Hünig et al. (1979) (43% yield) followed by reduction with sodium borohydride according to Fernández et al. (2001) (94% yield). The resulting diastereomeric mixture of pinolic acids (2.00 g) was dissolved in benzene (5 ml), acetic acid (2.58 g) and toluenesulfonic acid (0.47 g) were added. The mixture was refluxed for 3.5 h and water was separated using a Dean–Stark trap. The mixture was washed with water, the aqueous phase extracted with toluene and the combined organic layers were dried and the solvents removed in vacuo. The residue thus obtained was dissolved in heptane (5 ml), treated with active and filtered. Upon cooling, the mixture separated into two phases, the lower layer was dissolved in heptane (15 ml) and upon cooling for 3 days. The precipitated solid was recrystallized from heptane to yield 0.22 g (9%) of colorless crystals with m.p. = 360–362 K. Hergueta et al. (2003) report a melting point of the enantiopure compound of 258-258 K. Their NMR data correspond well with the results from the racemate, except a general deep-field shift of all H-NMR signals and a high-field shift of ca 0.25 p.p.m. in C-NMR. The numbering of H- and C-signals follows IUPAC nomenclature. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.77 (dq, J = 10.2, 6.2 Hz, 1H, 1′′-H), 2.41–2.15 (m, 3H, 2-H, 1′-H), 2.14–1.93 (m, 2H, 3′-H, 4′-H), 2.00 (s, 3H, 4′′-H), 1.30–1.16 (m, 1H, 4′-H), 1.08 (s, 3H, 5′′-H), 1.06 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 3H, 2′′-H), 0.88 (s, 3H, 6′′-H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 179.3 (C-1), 170.7 (C-3′′), 71.9 (C-1′′), 47.1 (C-3′), 40.0 (C-2′), 37.9 (C-1′), 35.0 (C-2), 30.5 (C-5′′), 26.5 (C-4′), 21.6 (C-4′′), 17.7 (C-2′′), 16.9 (C-6′′).
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure .
details are summarized in Table 2Structural data
CCDC reference: 2405160
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314624011441/bt4161sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314624011441/bt4161Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314624011441/bt4161Isup3.cml
References
Bucourt, R. (1974). Topics in Stereochemistry, vol. 8, pp. 159–224. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Coppens, P. (1970). Crystallographic Computing, edited by F. R. Ahmed, pp. 255–270. Munksgaard, Copenhagen. Google Scholar
Detert, H. & Schollmeyer, D. (2017). IUCrData, 2, x171550. Google Scholar
Fernández, F., Hergueta, A. R., López, C., De Clercq, E. & Balzarini, J. (2001). Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 20, 1129–1131. PubMed Google Scholar
Herges, R., Papafilippopoulos, A., Hess, C., Chiappe, C., Lenoir, D. & Detert, H. (2005). Angew. Chem. 117, 1437–1441. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hergueta, A. R., López, C., Fernández, F., Caamaño, O. & Blanco, J. M. (2003). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 14, 3773–3778. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hünig, S., Märkl, G. & Sauer, J. (1979). Integriertes Organisches Praktikum. Weinheim: VCH. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2020). X-RED and X-AREA. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.