inorganic compounds
Rerefinement of the α-ThBr4
ofaAG Fluorchemie, Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse 4, 35032 Marburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: f.kraus@uni-marburg.de
Single crystals of α-ThBr4, thorium(IV) tetrabromide, were obtained as a side product from the reaction of CuBr with β-ThBr4 at 753 K. In the the Th atom (site symmetry ..) is surrounded by eight Br atoms in the form of a tetragonal-disphenoidal The connectivity of these polyhedra is 3∞[ThBr4/2Br4/2]. In comparison with the previous [Mason et al. (1974). J. Less-Common Met. 35, 331–338], the current rerefinement resulted in much higher preciscion of the lattice parameters and the atomic coordinates.
Keywords: crystal structure; thorium; thorium bromide; actinide bromide.
CCDC reference: 2300477
Structure description
A crystal of ThBr4 in its α-modification was isolated as a side product from the reaction of β-ThBr4 with CuBr at 753 K.
The α-ThBr4 has been described only once, from a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study at room temperature (Mason et al., 1974), where the authors refer to this modification also as the low-temperature polymorph. They reported the transition temperature at 699 ± 5 K and the of α-ThBr4 was assigned to the α-ThCl4 structure type in the I41/a (No. 88, tI20). A comparison of the structural parameters of the original and of the current rerefinement is given in Table 1.
ofFig. 1 shows the based on the current X-ray diffraction data. There is one Th atom (multiplicity 4, Wyckoff letter a, ..) and one Br atom (16f, 1) in the The Th atom is surrounded by eight Br atoms to form a tetragonal-disphenoidal The Th—Br bond lengths of 4 × 2.9100 (4) Å and 4 × 3.0107 (4) Å are in good agreement with previously reported values of 2.909 and 3.020 Å (no s.u. values or temperature given; Mason et al., 1974), but different compared to those in β-ThBr4 (space group I41/amd), with values of 2.85 and 3.12 Å (no s.u. values or temperature given; Brown et al., 1973). Each Br atom bridges two Th atoms, which results in edge-sharing polyhedra to form the The connection motif of α-ThBr4 is similar to that in β-ThBr4. Although the two polymorphs differ considerably with respect to the two pairs of Th—Br distances, the connectivities in both structures can be described with the Niggli formula 3∞[ThBr4/2Br4/2]. The closest Th⋯Th distance of 4.77179 (12) Å in α-ThBr4 is shorter compared to β-ThBr4, with a value of 4.8774 Å (Brown et al., 1973). In the of α-ThBr4, each Th atom is surrounded by eight other Th atoms in the shape of an irregular polyhedron, with Th⋯Th distances of 4 × 4.77179 (12) Å and 4 × 6.70680 (19) Å.
Synthesis and crystallization
All work was carried under an argon atmosphere (5.0, Praxair) using a fine-vacuum line and a glove-box (MBraun). Silica ampoules were flame-dried under dynamic fine vacuum (10−3 mbar; 1 bar = 105 Pa) at least three times before use. Aluminium bromide (Alfa Aesar, 98%) was sublimed in vacuo before use; β-ThBr4 was prepared according to a literature protocol (Deubner et al., 2017).
A silica glass ampoule was loaded with β-ThBr4 (149 mg, 0.27 mmol) and CuBr (78 mg, 54 mmol, 2.01 equiv.), and sealed under vacuum. The ampoule was heated in a furnace to 753 K at a rate of 1 K min−1 and kept at this temperature for 480 h for the reaction to take place. Afterwards, it was cooled to 330 K at a rate of 50 K d−1. Several colourless crystals of α-ThBr4 were obtained.
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure .
details are summarized in Table 2
|
Structural data
CCDC reference: 2300477
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314623008908/wm4200sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314623008908/wm4200Isup2.hkl
Data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2019); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2019); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2019); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2022); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).ThBr4 | Melting point: 200 K |
Mr = 551.68 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, I41/a | Cell parameters from 9713 reflections |
a = 6.7068 (2) Å | θ = 3.0–30.6° |
c = 13.5792 (6) Å | µ = 50.43 mm−1 |
V = 610.81 (5) Å3 | T = 100 K |
Z = 4 | Block, colorless |
F(000) = 920 | 0.15 × 0.14 × 0.14 mm |
Dx = 5.999 Mg m−3 |
Bruker D8 QUEST diffractometer | 463 independent reflections |
Radiation source: Incoatec Microfocus | 463 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Multi layered optics monochromator | Rint = 0.049 |
Detector resolution: 10.42 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 30.5°, θmin = 5.2° |
φ and ω scans | h = −9→9 |
Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) | k = −9→9 |
Tmin = 0.016, Tmax = 0.078 | l = −19→19 |
9305 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0219P)2 + 6.5321P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.053 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.37 | Δρmax = 1.16 e Å−3 |
463 reflections | Δρmin = −1.72 e Å−3 |
13 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.0052 (4) |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Th1 | 0.000000 | 0.250000 | 0.125000 | 0.00764 (15) | |
Br1 | 0.33880 (6) | 0.47423 (6) | 0.20021 (3) | 0.00953 (16) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Th1 | 0.00844 (17) | 0.00844 (17) | 0.00604 (19) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Br1 | 0.0101 (2) | 0.0104 (2) | 0.0080 (2) | −0.00131 (13) | −0.00114 (13) | 0.00179 (13) |
Th1—Br1 | 2.9100 (4) | Th1—Br1iv | 3.0107 (4) |
Th1—Br1i | 2.9100 (4) | Th1—Br1v | 3.0107 (4) |
Th1—Br1ii | 2.9100 (4) | Th1—Br1vi | 3.0107 (4) |
Th1—Br1iii | 2.9100 (4) | Th1—Br1vii | 3.0107 (4) |
Br1—Th1—Br1i | 138.907 (16) | Br1—Th1—Br1vi | 72.606 (12) |
Br1—Th1—Br1ii | 97.075 (5) | Br1i—Th1—Br1vi | 75.260 (8) |
Br1i—Th1—Br1ii | 97.075 (5) | Br1ii—Th1—Br1vi | 72.605 (8) |
Br1—Th1—Br1iii | 97.076 (5) | Br1iii—Th1—Br1vi | 148.466 (14) |
Br1i—Th1—Br1iii | 97.075 (5) | Br1iv—Th1—Br1vi | 128.427 (10) |
Br1ii—Th1—Br1iii | 138.907 (16) | Br1v—Th1—Br1vi | 75.934 (16) |
Br1—Th1—Br1iv | 148.466 (14) | Br1—Th1—Br1vii | 72.605 (8) |
Br1i—Th1—Br1iv | 72.605 (8) | Br1i—Th1—Br1vii | 148.466 (14) |
Br1ii—Th1—Br1iv | 72.606 (12) | Br1ii—Th1—Br1vii | 75.260 (8) |
Br1iii—Th1—Br1iv | 75.260 (8) | Br1iii—Th1—Br1vii | 72.606 (12) |
Br1—Th1—Br1v | 75.260 (8) | Br1iv—Th1—Br1vii | 75.934 (16) |
Br1i—Th1—Br1v | 72.606 (12) | Br1v—Th1—Br1vii | 128.427 (10) |
Br1ii—Th1—Br1v | 148.466 (14) | Br1vi—Th1—Br1vii | 128.427 (10) |
Br1iii—Th1—Br1v | 72.605 (8) | Th1—Br1—Th1vi | 107.394 (12) |
Br1iv—Th1—Br1v | 128.427 (10) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1/2, z; (ii) y−1/4, −x+1/4, −z+1/4; (iii) −y+1/4, x+1/4, −z+1/4; (iv) −y+1/4, x−1/4, z−1/4; (v) x−1/2, y, −z+1/2; (vi) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1/2; (vii) y−1/4, −x+3/4, z−1/4. |
This work | Mason et al. (1974) | |
a (Å) | 6.7068 (2) | 6.737 (1) |
c (Å) | 13.5792 (6) | 13.601 (3) |
x, y, z Th | 0, 1/4, 1/8 | 0, 1/4, 1/8 |
x, y, z Br | 0.33880 (6), 0.47423 (6), 0.20021 (3) | 0.3378 (6), 0.4727 (7), 0.1998 (3) |
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant No. KR3595/13-1).
References
Brandenburg, K. (2022). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Brown, D., Hall, T. L. & Moseley, P. T. (1973). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 686–691. CrossRef ICSD Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2019). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS INC., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Deubner, H. L., Rudel, S. S. & Kraus, F. (2017). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 643, 2005–2010. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mason, J. T., Jha, M. C., Bailey, D. M. & Chiotti, P. (1974). J. Less-Common Met. 35, 331–338. CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.