organic compounds
(1E,5E)-2,5-Dibromocyclododeca-1,5-dien-9-yne
aUniversity of Mainz, Institut of Organic Chemistry, Duesbergweg 10-14, 55099 Mainz, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: detert@uni-mainz.de
The title compound, C12H14Br2, was prepared by bromination/dehydrobromination of E,E,Z-cyclododecatriene. The crystal is composed of C2-symmetrical molecules with an E conformation of the bromoalkene fragments and nearly linear alkyne units. The torsion angles in the ring suggest significant ring strain.
Keywords: crystal structure; organobromine compound; cycloalkyne.
CCDC reference: 1581763
Structure description
Dibromocyclododecatriene has been prepared as intermediate for the selective synthesis of (Z,Z,Z)-cyclododecatriene (Trauer & Haufe, 1988) and cyclotridecatrienes (Trauer & Haufe, 1990). The former is a valuable intermediate for the preparation of cyclododecatriyne (Barkovich & Vollhardt, 1976) and hexaradialene (Barkovich et al. 1980). Currently, strained are central coupling partners in click chemistry. Even medium-sized cycloalkynes can be highly strained (Meier et al. 1982; Bissinger et al. 1988).
The orthorhombic ) is filled with four identical molecules of C2 symmetry: the X-ray analysis gives proof for the E-conformation of the bromovinylene units. The C2-symmetrical molecule shows a nearly perfect linearity of the alkyne unit with bond angles at the sp carbon atoms of 178.4 (4)°. Whereas the ethylene unit C1—C1i [symmetry code: (i) −x, y, −z + ] possesses quasi ideal bond and torsion angles, the bond angles at C4 [C3—C4—C5 = 112.0 (6)°] and C5 [C4—C5—C6 = 113.9 (6)°] are slightly opened. The same holds for the sp2 carbon atoms [C3—C2—C1 = 128.0 (6)°]. These deformations and the torsion angles C2—C3—C4—C5 = −102.7 (8) and C3—C4—C5—C6 = 73.4 (8)° indicate geometrical ring strain even in a macrocyclic alkyne. In the crystal (Fig. 2), no directional interactions beyond normal van der Waals contacts could be identified.
of the title compound (Fig. 1Synthesis and crystallization
The title compound was prepared in a two-step procedure. First, 40.5 g (0.25 mol) of E,E,Z-1,5,9-cyclododecatriene in a Morton flask (2 l) containing 1 l anhydrous ether was cooled in an ice bath (CaCl2 tube). A solution of 120.0 g, of bromine (0.75 mol) in dichloromethane in a constant addition funnel with Mariott tube (NORMAG) was added dropwise to the heavily stirred solution. When the colour vanished, 100 ml of petroleum ether was added slowly and the precipitate was collected on a Büchner funnel, yield: 132.8 g (83%) of a white powder with m.p. 471 K. Dehydrobromination of 6.4 g of the hexabromocyclododecane with sodium ethanolate in ethanol was performed according to Trauer & Haufe (1988) and yielded 2.13 g (65%) of an off-white powder with m.p. 431 K. Colourless blocks were grown via slow evaporation of a solution in chloroform and 2-propanol (1:1).
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure .
details are summarized in Table 1Structural data
CCDC reference: 1581763
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314617015504/hb4171sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314617015504/hb4171Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2414314617015504/hb4171Isup3.cml
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); cell
X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); data reduction: X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b).C12H14Br2 | Dx = 1.772 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 318.05 | Melting point: 431 K |
Orthorhombic, Pbcn | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 16.8714 (12) Å | Cell parameters from 9463 reflections |
b = 7.7191 (4) Å | θ = 2.4–28.4° |
c = 9.1556 (5) Å | µ = 6.76 mm−1 |
V = 1192.35 (12) Å3 | T = 120 K |
Z = 4 | Block, colourless |
F(000) = 624 | 0.27 × 0.23 × 0.22 mm |
Stoe IPDS 2T diffractometer | 1465 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus | 1204 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Plane graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.031 |
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 28.2°, θmin = 2.4° |
rotation method scans | h = −22→22 |
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2006b) | k = −10→10 |
Tmin = 0.190, Tmax = 0.356 | l = −11→12 |
7295 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.193 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0757P)2 + 11.4374P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.20 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1465 reflections | Δρmax = 1.54 e Å−3 |
64 parameters | Δρmin = −0.69 e Å−3 |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Hydrogen atoms attached to carbons were placed at calculated positions with C—H = 0.95 Å (sp2) or 0.99 Å (sp3 C-atom). All H atoms were refined in the riding-model approximation with isotropic displacement parameters (set at 1.2–1.5 times of the Ueq of the parent atom). |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br1 | 0.15412 (3) | 0.49337 (7) | 0.37567 (6) | 0.0204 (3) | |
C1 | 0.0288 (3) | 0.3816 (8) | 0.1832 (7) | 0.0243 (12) | |
H1A | 0.010594 | 0.295662 | 0.110314 | 0.029* | |
H1B | 0.028447 | 0.497259 | 0.136454 | 0.029* | |
C2 | 0.1119 (3) | 0.3376 (8) | 0.2315 (7) | 0.0223 (12) | |
C3 | 0.1575 (3) | 0.2044 (9) | 0.1877 (8) | 0.0265 (13) | |
H3 | 0.208538 | 0.193789 | 0.230594 | 0.032* | |
C4 | 0.1342 (4) | 0.0716 (9) | 0.0768 (8) | 0.0300 (14) | |
H4A | 0.179279 | 0.051056 | 0.009796 | 0.036* | |
H4B | 0.089357 | 0.116479 | 0.018263 | 0.036* | |
C5 | 0.1100 (5) | −0.1000 (9) | 0.1478 (8) | 0.0339 (16) | |
H5A | 0.109077 | −0.191212 | 0.071789 | 0.041* | |
H5B | 0.150743 | −0.132693 | 0.220615 | 0.041* | |
C6 | 0.0324 (4) | −0.0948 (8) | 0.2201 (8) | 0.0305 (14) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br1 | 0.0147 (4) | 0.0213 (4) | 0.0251 (4) | −0.00532 (19) | −0.0026 (2) | 0.00172 (19) |
C1 | 0.017 (2) | 0.026 (3) | 0.031 (3) | 0.001 (2) | −0.002 (3) | 0.001 (3) |
C2 | 0.020 (3) | 0.025 (3) | 0.022 (3) | −0.002 (2) | −0.001 (2) | 0.005 (2) |
C3 | 0.018 (3) | 0.031 (3) | 0.031 (3) | 0.002 (2) | 0.001 (2) | 0.005 (3) |
C4 | 0.025 (3) | 0.039 (4) | 0.025 (3) | 0.005 (3) | 0.002 (3) | −0.001 (3) |
C5 | 0.033 (4) | 0.027 (3) | 0.042 (4) | 0.009 (3) | 0.004 (3) | −0.001 (3) |
C6 | 0.038 (3) | 0.025 (3) | 0.029 (3) | −0.001 (3) | −0.002 (3) | 0.000 (3) |
Br1—C2 | 1.922 (6) | C4—C5 | 1.531 (11) |
C1—C2 | 1.509 (8) | C4—H4A | 0.9900 |
C1—C1i | 1.562 (12) | C4—H4B | 0.9900 |
C1—H1A | 0.9900 | C5—C6 | 1.469 (10) |
C1—H1B | 0.9900 | C5—H5A | 0.9900 |
C2—C3 | 1.346 (9) | C5—H5B | 0.9900 |
C3—C4 | 1.495 (10) | C6—C6i | 1.222 (14) |
C3—H3 | 0.9500 | ||
C2—C1—C1i | 110.4 (6) | C3—C4—H4A | 109.2 |
C2—C1—H1A | 109.6 | C5—C4—H4A | 109.2 |
C1i—C1—H1A | 109.6 | C3—C4—H4B | 109.2 |
C2—C1—H1B | 109.6 | C5—C4—H4B | 109.2 |
C1i—C1—H1B | 109.6 | H4A—C4—H4B | 107.9 |
H1A—C1—H1B | 108.1 | C6—C5—C4 | 113.9 (6) |
C3—C2—C1 | 128.0 (6) | C6—C5—H5A | 108.8 |
C3—C2—Br1 | 118.1 (5) | C4—C5—H5A | 108.8 |
C1—C2—Br1 | 113.9 (4) | C6—C5—H5B | 108.8 |
C2—C3—C4 | 125.2 (6) | C4—C5—H5B | 108.8 |
C2—C3—H3 | 117.4 | H5A—C5—H5B | 107.7 |
C4—C3—H3 | 117.4 | C6i—C6—C5 | 178.4 (4) |
C3—C4—C5 | 112.0 (6) | ||
C1i—C1—C2—C3 | 120.5 (6) | Br1—C2—C3—C4 | −179.9 (5) |
C1i—C1—C2—Br1 | −58.5 (4) | C2—C3—C4—C5 | −102.7 (8) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 1.2 (11) | C3—C4—C5—C6 | 73.4 (8) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2. |
References
Barkovich, A. J., Strauss, E. S. & Vollhardt, K. P. C. (1980). Isr. J. Chem. 20, 225–232. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Barkovich, A. J. & Vollhardt, K. P. C. (1976). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 2667–2668. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bissinger, H. J., Detert, H. & Meier, H. (1988). Liebigs Ann. Chem. pp. 221–224. CrossRef Google Scholar
Meier, H., Molz, T., Merkle, U., Echter, T. & Lorch, M. (1982). Liebigs Ann. Chem. pp. 914–923. CrossRef Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2006). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Trauer, H. & Haufe, G. (1988). Z. Chem. 28, 290–291. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Trauer, H. & Haufe, G. (1990). J. Chem. Res. (S), 7, 210–211. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.