Dimorphism of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) – the ordered Pna21 structure at 100 K

Weil, M.; Missen, O.P.; Mills, S.J.

doi:10.1107/S205698902301023X

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 79| Part 12| December 2023| Pages 1223-1227

https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698902301023X

Open

access

Dimorphism of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) – the ordered Pna2₁ structure at 100 K

Matthias Weil,^a ^* Owen P. Missen ^b,^c ‡ and Stuart J. Mills ^c

^aInstitute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Structural Chemistry, TU Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/E164-05-1, A-1060 Vienna, Austria, ^bSchool of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia, and ^cGeosciences, Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne 3001, Victoria, Australia
^*Correspondence e-mail: matthias.weil@tuwien.ac.at

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 23 November 2023; accepted 28 November 2023; online 30 November 2023)

The re-investigation of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃), dioxidodibismuth(III) hydroxide nitrate, on the basis of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data revealed an apparent structural phase transition of a crystal structure determined previously (space group Cmc2₁ at 173 K) to a crystal structure with lower symmetry (space group Pna2₁ at 100 K). The Cmc2₁ → Pna2₁ group–subgroup relationship between the two crystal structures is klassengleiche with index 2. In contrast to the crystal structure in Cmc2₁ with orientational disorder of the nitrate anion, disorder does not occur in the Pna2₁ structure. Apart from the disorder of the nitrate anion, the general structural set-up in the two crystal structures is very similar: [Bi₂O₂]²⁺ layers extend parallel to (001) and alternate with layers of (OH)⁻ anions above and (NO₃)⁻ anions below the cationic layer. Whereas the (OH)⁻ anion shows strong bonds to the Bi^III cations, the (NO₃)⁻ anion weakly binds to the Bi^III cations of the cationic layer. A rather weak O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding interaction between the (OH)⁻ anion and the (NO₃)⁻ anion links adjacent sheets along [001].

Keywords: crystal structure; phase transition; ordered structure; [Bi₂O₂]²⁺; nitrate group; group–subgroup relationship; Bärnighausen tree.

CCDC reference: 2310821

1. Chemical context

During hydrothermal phase-formation studies of synthetic montanite, a bismuth(III) oxidotellurate(VI) mineral with composition Bi₂TeO₆·nH₂O (0 ≤ n ≤ 2/3; Missen et al., 2022 ), small amounts of basic bismuth(III) nitrate [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) were also obtained when the starting materials Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O (Herpin & Sudarsanan, 1965 ; Lazarini, 1985 ), Te(OH)₆ and KOH were reacted under hydrothermal conditions. It is worth noting that no minerals containing both Bi and (NO₃)⁻ have yet been found and described, with all examples of these compounds being synthetic. A routine unit-cell search at 100 K for selected crystals revealed unit-cell parameters very close to those of previously reported [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) (Henry et al., 2005 ; 173 K single-crystal X-ray data), however not with a C-centred but with a primitive orthorhombic unit cell. We therefore decided to determine the crystal structure based on the 100 K data and report here the results of this study.

2. Structural commentary

The previous crystal-structure determination and refinement of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) in space group Cmc2₁ resulted in a model with the nitrate anion being disordered over two possible orientations. As noted in the original report, this disorder could not be resolved: `Attempts to further lower the symmetry to order those anions was not successful and no supercell spots were detected on single crystal and powder diffraction data' (Henry et al., 2005). The current single-crystal X-ray diffraction data clearly revealed space group Pna2₁, and the observed disorder of the nitrate anion does not prevail in the primitive unit cell, indicating that an apparent structural phase transition has taken place between 173 K and 100 K. Fig. 1 shows the Bärnighausen tree (Bärnighausen, 1980 ; Müller, 2013 ) indicating the group–subgroup relationship between the two space groups and the associated crystal structures, denoted in the following as [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I for the 173 K data in space group Cmc2₁ and as [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II for the 100 K data in space group Pna2₁. The latter is a klassengleiche subgroup of Cmc2₁ with index 2. All atoms in [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I that are located on sites with mirror symmetry, viz. atoms Bi1, Bi2, O2, O3 and N1, lie on general positions in [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II. The O1 site in the higher-symmetry structure splits into two sites (O1A, O1B) in the lower-symmetry structure, and the two disordered (half-occupied) sites O4 and O5 fully order.

Figure 1
Bärnighausen tree of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃), showing the detailed group–subgroup relationship between the Cmc2₁ and Pna2₁ structures.

Apart from the ordering of the (NO₃)⁻ group, the general structural set-up is very similar in the two crystal structures. [Bi₂O₂]²⁺ layers, defined by atoms Bi1, Bi2, and O1, are sandwiched between layers of (NO₃)⁻ anions (N1, O3–O5) above and (OH)⁻ anions (O2) below. Cohesion between the resulting [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) sheets is achieved through presumed weak O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the hydroxide anion and atom O4 of the nitrate anion (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Crystal structures of the [Bi₂O₂(OH)(NO₃)] polymorphs. Strong Bi—O bonds (2.20–2.62 Å) are shown as black lines, weaker Bi—O bonds (2.80–3.00 Å) as grey lines; colour code for both structures: Bi1 blue, Bi2 light blue, N1 purple, O2 associated with the OH group green, all other O atoms white; the O2⋯O hydrogen bond is displayed with green lines. (a) The Pna2₁ structure of Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II with atoms at the 97% probability level; symmetry codes refer to Table 1

and (b) the Cmc2₁ structure of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I (Henry et al., 2005

) with atoms shown as spheres of arbitrary radius. In the inset, the nitrate group is rotated by 60° to show the disorder present in Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I.

Individual bond lengths of the structure units in the two polymorphs differ slightly (Table 1); numerical values are discussed in the following paragraph only for [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II. Within the [Bi₂O₂]²⁺ layer, the two Bi^III cations exhibit four bonds each [range 2.1964 (8)–2.657 (12) Å] to the O1A and O1B atoms that, in turn, are tetrahedrally surrounded by the Bi^III cations. Such anion-centered [OBi₄] tetrahedra are a common structural motif in inorganic bismuth(III) compounds (Krivovichev et al., 2013 ). Additional strong Bi^III—O interactions of 2.335 (9) and 2.493 (9) Å include the O2 atom of the hydroxide anion in the adjacent layer. On the other hand, the nitrate anion is only weakly bonded to the Bi^III cations of the cationic layer, with four Bi1—O3 interactions ranging from 2.868 (9) to 2.942 (9) Å, and another weak Bi2—O4 bond of 3.080 (10) Å. Overall, both Bi^III cations have eight oxygen atoms as coordination partners. The [Bi1O₈] coordination polyhedron can be described as a distorted square antiprism, whereas the [Bi2O₅(OH)₃] coordination polyhedron shows a significantly greater distortion (Table 1) and is difficult to derive from a simple geometric shape. In both cases, the 6s² free electron pair E of Bi^III located at the top of the {BiO₄} square-pyramid (as defined by the four short Bi—O bonds) is made responsible for the distortion of the polyhedra. The resulting stereochemical effect appears to be less pronounced for the [Bi1O₈] coordination polyhedron, but is much clearer with the [Bi2O₅(OH)₃] coordination polyhedron. This behaviour might possibly be explained by the stronger repulsive interaction between E and the surrounding (OH)⁻ groups. The ordered (NO₃)⁻ group in [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II has an average N—O bond length of 1.264 Å, which is slightly longer but within the single standard deviation of the mean literature value of 1.247 (29) Å calculated for 468 N—O bonds in nitrates (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018 ). The O—N—O bond angles range from 118.7 (10) to 121.3 (11)°, indicating a slight angular distortion. However, the (NO₃)⁻ group does not deviate from planarity as observed for many nitrates, with deviations of up to 0.02 Å (Jarosch & Zemann, 1983 ). In [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II, the root-mean-square deviation of fitted atoms is 0.0014 Å, with a deviation for N1 of −0.003 (10) Å from the plane defined by O3, O4(x − 1, y, z) and O5.

Table 1
Comparison of bond lengths (Å) in the Pna2₁ and Cmc2₁ structures of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)

O atoms marked with an asterisk show half-occupancy.

[Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II (Pna2₁)		[Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I (Cmc2₁)
Bi1—O1Bⁱ	2.203 (8)	Bi1—O1	2.226 (8)
Bi1—O1Bⁱⁱ	2.207 (8)	Bi1—O1^a	2.226 (8)
Bi1—O1A	2.226 (8)	Bi1—O1^b	2.244 (8)
Bi1—O1Aⁱ	2.292 (8)	Bi1—O1^c	2.244 (8)
Bi1—O3ⁱⁱⁱ	2.868 (9)	Bi1—O3^d	2.873 (11)
Bi1—O3ⁱⁱ	2.868 (8)	Bi1—O3	2.911 (4)
Bi1—O3	2.924 (8)	Bi1—O3^e	2.911 (4)
Bi1—O3ⁱ	2.941 (9)	Bi1—O3^f	2.957 (11)
Bi2—O1A	2.197 (8)	Bi2—O1	2.239 (7)
Bi2—O1B	2.267 (8)	Bi2—O1^g	2.239 (7)
Bi2—O2	2.334 (9)	Bi2—O2	2.341 (17)
Bi2—O1Aⁱ	2.462 (8)	Bi2—O1^h	2.540 (8)
Bi2—O2ⁱ	2.493 (9)	Bi2—O1^c	2.540 (8)
Bi2—O1B^iv	2.619 (8)	Bi2—O2^h	2.839 (6)
Bi2—O4^v	3.080 (10)	Bi2—O2^b	2.839 (6)
Bi2—O2^iv	3.149 (9)
N1—O5	1.251 (14)	N1—O5*	1.21 (3)
		N1—O5^j*	1.21 (3)^j
N1—O4^vi	1.251 (13)	N1—O4*	1.19 (2)
		N1—O4^j*	1.19 (2)
N1—O3	1.291 (14)	N1—O3	1.272 (16)
O2⋯O4^vii	2.953 (14)	O2⋯O5*	2.97 (3)
		O2⋯O5^j*	2.97 (3)
Symmetry codes for the Pna2₁ structure: (i) x − $[{1\over 2}]$ , −y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z; (ii) x, y − 1, z; (iii) x + $[{1\over 2}]$ , −y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z; (iv) x − $[{1\over 2}]$ , −y + $[{3\over 2}]$ , z; (v) −x + 1, −y + 1, z − $[{1\over 2}]$ ; (vi) x − 1, y, z; (vii) −x + $[{3\over 2}]$ , y − $[{1\over 2}]$ , z − $[{1\over 2}]$ . Symmetry codes for the Cmc2₁ structure: (a) −x, y, z; (b) − $[{1\over 2}]$ + x, − $[{1\over 2}]$ + y, z; (c) $[{1\over 2}]$ − x, − $[{1\over 2}]$ + y, z; (d) − $[{1\over 2}]$ + x, $[{1\over 2}]$ + y, z; (e) −1 + x, y, z; (f) − $[{1\over 2}]$ + x, − $[{1\over 2}]$ + y, z; (g) − $[{1\over 2}]$ + x, − $[{1\over 2}]$ + y, z; (h) $[{1\over 2}]$ + x, − $[{1\over 2}]$ + y, z; (j) 1 − x, y, z.

As shown in Fig. 2, the hydrogen-bonding schemes in the two [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) polymorphs are different. Based on the closest O2⋯O contacts between the hydroxide and the nitrate anion, the acceptor changes from O5 [O⋯O = 2.97 (3) Å] in [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I to O4 [O⋯O = 2.953 (14) Å] in [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II. The closest contact of O2 to O5 in polymorph-II then is 3.017 (14) Å and that of O2 to O4 in polymorph-I is 3.16 Å. The differences in hydrogen-bonding correlate with the ordering of the (NO₃)⁻ anion, which might be the driving force for the Cmc2₁ → Pna2₁ phase transition. A similar situation is found for the double salt (NH₄)₂SeO₄·3NH₄NO₃ for which the high-temperature polymorph shows disorder of one of the nitrate groups that is fully resolved for the low-temperature polymorph (Weil et al., 2023 ).

Bond-valence sums (Brown, 2002 ) were computed to validate the crystal structure model of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II. For the Bi^III—O pair, the parameters of Krivovichev (2012 ) and for the pair N^V—O the parameters of Brese & O'Keeffe (1991 ) were used (results in valence units with the numbers and types of coordination partners in parentheses): Bi1 3.02 (8, O); Bi2 2.89 (8, O); N1 4.73 (3, O); O1A 2.17 (4, Bi); O1B 2.11 (4, Bi), O2 0.84 (2, Bi); O3 2.06 (5, N + 4Bi); O4 1.72 (2, N + Bi), O5 1.63 (1, N). The results confirm the expected oxidation state of +III for Bi, and also show the underbonding of O2 as being part of the hydroxide group, and of O4 and O5 as possible acceptor atoms of hydrogen bonds.

3. Database survey

As described above, the crystal structures of the [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) polymorphs comprise of [Bi₂O₂]²⁺ layers that are typical for Aurivillius phases (Henry et al., 2005). [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) remains the only basic bismuth(III) nitrate for which this structural motif is known so far in the solid state. As shown for numerous other basic bismuth(III) nitrate phases obtained under hydrolytic conditions of Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O, the hexanuclear cation [Bi₆O_4+x(OH)_4–x]^(6–x)+ with x = 0 and x = 1 was reported to be the predominant species (Nørlund Christensen et al., 2000 ). Later, Henry et al. (2005) gave a general formula of [Bi₆O_x(OH)_8-x]^(10–x)+ for the compositorial range of this complex cation.

A search of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD, version 2023_1; Zagorac et al., 2019 ) revealed the following basic bismuth(III) nitrate phases where this complex cation is part of the crystal structure (designation of the phases as in the original literature): [Bi₆O₅(OH)₃](NO₃)₅·3H₂O (Lazarini, 1978 ), [Bi₆(H₂O)(NO₃)O₄(OH)₄)](NO₃)₅ (Lazarini, 1979a ), Bi₆O₄(HO)₄(NO₃)₆·H₂O (Sundvall, 1979 ), [Bi₆O_4.5(OH)_3.5]₂(NO₃)₁₁ (Henry et al., 2003 ), [Bi₆O₄(OH)₄]_0.54[Bi₆O₅(OH)₃]_0.46(NO₃)_5.54 (Nørlund Christensen & Lebech, 2012 ), [Bi₆O₄(OH)₄](NO₃)₆ (Henry et al., 2006 ), [Bi₆O₄(OH)₄(NO₃)₅(H₂O)](NO₃) (Miersch et al., 2012 ), [Bi₆O₄(OH)₄(NO₃)₆(H₂O)₂]·H₂O (Miersch et al., 2012), [Bi₆O₄(OH)₄](NO₃)₆·4H₂O (Lazarini, 1979b ), [Bi₁₂(μ₃-OH)₄(μ₂-OH)₂(μ₃-O)₈(μ₄-O)₂(NO₃)₆](NO₃)₄(H₂O)₆ (Liu et al., 2007 ).

4. Synthesis and crystallization

Crystals of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) were obtained in a hydrothermal reaction as a byproduct from a mixture of Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O (0.0786 g), Te(OH)₆ (0.0124 g) and KOH (0.0060 g) in a 3:1:2 molar ratio. The reactants were intermixed and 3.62 g of water was added to achieve a 2/3 inner volume of the Teflon container. The reaction vessel was enclosed in a steel autoclave, heated to 473 K and reacted for a period of 69 days under autogenous pressure. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature by removing the autoclave from the oven. The solid material obtained after the reaction time was filtered off through a glass frit, washed with mother liquor, water and ethanol and dried in air. Aside from few light-yellow crystals of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) with a plate-like form, all other products were cryptocrystalline.

5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. Inspection of the diffraction data revealed twinning by a 180° rotation about the c axis and inversion, which means that the Flack parameter could not be determined. After crystal structure solution, the atomic coordinates and atom labelling were adapted to the Cmc2₁ structure (Henry et al., 2005) for better comparison. The Bi atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, all other atoms with isotropic displacement parameters each; the H atom of the hydroxide anion (O2) could not be localized. The remaining maximum (3.03 e⁻ Å⁻³) and minimum (−3.58 e⁻ Å⁻³) electron-density peaks are located 1.63 and 1.47 Å away from Bi2 and Bi1, respectively.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)
M_r	528.98
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Pna2₁
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	5.3854 (13), 5.3676 (13), 17.051 (4)
V (Å³)	492.9 (2)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	71.27
Crystal size (mm)	0.09 × 0.08 × 0.01

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction	Numerical (HABITUS; Herrendorf, 1997 )
T_min, T_max	0.017, 0.524
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	9853, 2798, 2407
R_int	0.062
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.881

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.030, 0.057, 0.98
No. of reflections	2798
No. of parameters	48
No. of restraints	1
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters not defined
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	3.13, −3.61
Absolute structure	Twinning involves inversion, so Flack parameter cannot be determined
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016 ), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), ATOMS (Dowty, 2005 ) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 2310821

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698902301023X/hb8084sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698902301023X/hb8084Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Dioxidodibismuth(III) hydroxide nitrate top

Crystal data top

[Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)	D_x = 7.129 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 528.98	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pna2₁	Cell parameters from 3403 reflections
a = 5.3854 (13) Å	θ = 2.9–36.3°
b = 5.3676 (13) Å	µ = 71.27 mm⁻¹
c = 17.051 (4) Å	T = 100 K
V = 492.9 (2) Å³	Plate, light yellow
Z = 4	0.09 × 0.08 × 0.01 mm
F(000) = 888

Data collection top

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer	2407 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω–scans	R_int = 0.062
Absorption correction: numerical (HABITUS; Herrendorf, 1997)	θ_max = 38.8°, θ_min = 1.2°
T_min = 0.017, T_max = 0.524	h = −8→9
9853 measured reflections	k = −9→8
2798 independent reflections	l = −29→29

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	1 restraint
Least-squares matrix: full	H-atom parameters not defined
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.030	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0213P)²] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
wR(F²) = 0.057	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
S = 0.98	Δρ_max = 3.13 e Å⁻³
2798 reflections	Δρ_min = −3.61 e Å⁻³
48 parameters	Absolute structure: Twinning involves inversion, so Flack parameter cannot be determined

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refined as a 2-component inversion twin.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Bi1	0.04362 (7)	−0.00785 (7)	0.23658 (3)	0.00299 (7)
Bi2	0.08217 (8)	0.48199 (6)	0.08442 (4)	0.00432 (8)
O1A	0.2866 (15)	0.2468 (15)	0.1678 (5)	0.0041 (15)*
O1B	0.2840 (15)	0.7394 (15)	0.1683 (5)	0.0053 (15)*
O2	0.4937 (17)	0.4539 (16)	0.0423 (6)	0.0097 (15)*
N1	0.021 (2)	0.4969 (18)	0.3759 (6)	0.0091 (19)*
O3	0.0363 (16)	0.4977 (15)	0.3004 (5)	0.0089 (14)*
O4	0.8650 (17)	0.6351 (17)	0.4084 (6)	0.0148 (19)*
O5	0.1626 (17)	0.3604 (16)	0.4153 (6)	0.0145 (18)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Bi1	0.00314 (12)	0.00303 (15)	0.00279 (14)	−0.00018 (11)	0.00001 (12)	0.0001 (2)
Bi2	0.00461 (13)	0.00439 (16)	0.00395 (15)	−0.00002 (11)	−0.00086 (14)	0.0010 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Bi1—O1Bⁱ	2.203 (8)	Bi2—O1B	2.267 (8)
Bi1—O1Bⁱⁱ	2.207 (8)	Bi2—O2	2.334 (9)
Bi1—O1A	2.226 (8)	Bi2—O1Aⁱ	2.462 (8)
Bi1—O1Aⁱ	2.292 (8)	Bi2—O2ⁱ	2.493 (9)
Bi1—O3ⁱⁱⁱ	2.868 (9)	Bi2—O1B^iv	2.619 (8)
Bi1—O3ⁱⁱ	2.868 (8)	N1—O5	1.251 (14)
Bi1—O3	2.924 (8)	N1—O4^v	1.251 (13)
Bi1—O3ⁱ	2.941 (9)	N1—O3	1.291 (14)
Bi2—O1A	2.197 (8)

O1Bⁱ—Bi1—O1Bⁱⁱ	75.34 (18)	O1Aⁱ—Bi2—O1B^iv	64.7 (3)
O1Bⁱ—Bi1—O1A	116.2 (3)	O2ⁱ—Bi2—O1B^iv	125.2 (3)
O1Bⁱⁱ—Bi1—O1A	75.8 (3)	Bi2—O1A—Bi1	113.5 (3)
O1Bⁱ—Bi1—O1Aⁱ	72.0 (3)	Bi2—O1A—Bi1ⁱⁱⁱ	106.4 (3)
O1Bⁱⁱ—Bi1—O1Aⁱ	117.4 (3)	Bi1—O1A—Bi1ⁱⁱⁱ	117.4 (4)
O1A—Bi1—O1Aⁱ	73.15 (16)	Bi2—O1A—Bi2ⁱⁱⁱ	103.7 (3)
O1A—Bi2—O1B	72.6 (3)	Bi1—O1A—Bi2ⁱⁱⁱ	112.2 (3)
O1A—Bi2—O2	71.7 (3)	Bi1ⁱⁱⁱ—O1A—Bi2ⁱⁱⁱ	102.1 (3)
O1B—Bi2—O2	77.2 (3)	Bi1ⁱⁱⁱ—O1B—Bi1^vi	116.1 (4)
O1A—Bi2—O1Aⁱ	70.34 (18)	Bi1ⁱⁱⁱ—O1B—Bi2	107.1 (3)
O1B—Bi2—O1Aⁱ	104.4 (3)	Bi1^vi—O1B—Bi2	115.2 (4)
O2—Bi2—O1Aⁱ	139.4 (3)	Bi1ⁱⁱⁱ—O1B—Bi2^vii	102.8 (3)
O1A—Bi2—O2ⁱ	75.1 (3)	Bi1^vi—O1B—Bi2^vii	107.3 (3)
O1B—Bi2—O2ⁱ	147.7 (3)	Bi2—O1B—Bi2^vii	107.3 (3)
O2—Bi2—O2ⁱ	91.8 (3)	Bi2—O2—Bi2ⁱⁱⁱ	98.8 (3)
O1Aⁱ—Bi2—O2ⁱ	64.8 (3)	O5—N1—O4^v	121.3 (11)
O1A—Bi2—O1B^iv	106.4 (3)	O5—N1—O3	120.0 (10)
O1B—Bi2—O1B^iv	66.50 (16)	O4^v—N1—O3	118.7 (10)
O2—Bi2—O1B^iv	141.9 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z; (iv) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (v) x−1, y, z; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z.

Comparison of bond lengths (Å) in the Pna2₁ and Cmc2₁ structures of [Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃) top

O atoms marked with an asterisk show half-occupancy.

[Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-II (Pna2₁)		[Bi₂O₂(OH)](NO₃)-I (Cmc2₁)
Bi1—O1Bⁱ	2.203 (8)	Bi1—O1	2.226 (8)
Bi1—O1Bⁱⁱ	2.207 (8)	Bi1—O1^a	2.226 (8)
Bi1—O1A	2.226 (8)	Bi1—O1^b	2.244 (8)
Bi1—O1Aⁱ	2.292 (8)	Bi1—O1^c	2.244 (8)
Bi1—O3ⁱⁱⁱ	2.868 (9)	Bi1—O3^d	2.873 (11)
Bi1—O3ⁱⁱ	2.868 (8)	Bi1—O3	2.911 (4)
Bi1—O3	2.924 (8)	Bi1—O3^e	2.911 (4)
Bi1—O3ⁱ	2.941 (9)	Bi1—O3^f	2.957 (11)
Bi2—O1A	2.197 (8)	Bi2—O1	2.239 (7)
Bi2—O1B	2.267 (8)	Bi2—O1^g	2.239 (7)
Bi2—O2	2.334 (9)	Bi2—O2	2.341 (17)
Bi2—O1Aⁱ	2.462 (8)	Bi2—O1^h	2.540 (8)
Bi2—O2ⁱ	2.493 (9)	Bi2—O1^c	2.540 (8)
Bi2—O1B^iv	2.619 (8)	Bi2—O2^h	2.839 (6)
Bi2—O4^v	3.080 (10)	Bi2—O2^b	2.839 (6)
Bi2—O2^iv	3.149 (9)
N1—O5	1.251 (14)	N1—O5*	1.21 (3)
		N1—O5^j*	1.21 (3)^j
N1—O4^vi	1.251 (13)	N1—O4*	1.19 (2)
		N1—O4^j*	1.19 (2)
N1—O3	1.291 (14)	N1—O3	1.272 (16)
O2···O4^vii	2.953 (14)	O2···O5*	2.97 (3)
		O2···O5^j*	2.97 (3)

Symmetry codes for the Pna2₁ structure: (i) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, z; (ii) x, y - 1, z; (iii) x + 1/2, -y+1/2, z; (iv) x - 1/2, -y + 3/2, z; (v) -x + 1, -y + 1, z - 1/2; (vi) x - 1, y, z; (vii) -x + 3/2, y - 1/2, z - 1/2. Symmetry codes for the Cmc2₁ structure: (a) -x, y, z; (b) -1/2 + x, -1/2 + y, z; (c) 1/2 - x, -1/2 + y, z; (d) -1/2 + x, 1/2 + y, z; (e) -1 + x, y, z; (f) -1/2 + x, -1/2 + y, z; (g) -1/2 + x, -1/2 + y, z; (h) 1/2 + x, -1/2 + y, z; (j) 1 - x, y, z.

Footnotes

‡Current address: Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, TAS, Private Bag 79, Hobart 7001, Australia

Acknowledgements

The X-ray centre of the TU Wien is acknowledged for granting free access to the single-crystal X-ray diffractometer. We thank TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Programme. Support funding was provided to OPM by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship, a Monash Graduate Excellence Scholarship (MGES) and a Robert Blackwood Monash-Museums Victoria scholarship.

References

Bärnighausen, H. (1980). MATCH, Commun. Math. Chem. 9, 139–175. Google Scholar
Brese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Bruker (2016). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA. Google Scholar
Dowty, E. (2005). ATOMS. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar
Gagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 63–78. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Henry, N., Evain, M., Deniard, P., Jobic, S., Abraham, F. & Mentré, O. (2005). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 60, 322–327. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Henry, N., Evain, M., Deniard, P., Jobic, S., Mentré, O. & Abraham, F. (2003). J. Solid State Chem. 176, 127–136. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Henry, N., Mentré, O., Abraham, F., MacLean, E. J. & Roussel, P. (2006). J. Solid State Chem. 179, 3087–3094. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Herpin, P. & Sudarsanan, K. (1965). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr. 88, 590–594. CAS Google Scholar
Herrendorf, W. (1997). HABITUS. University of Giessen, Germany. Google Scholar
Jarosch, D. & Zemann, J. (1983). Monatsh. Chem. 114, 267–272. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S. V. (2012). Z. Kristallogr. 227, 575–579. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S. V., Mentré, O., Siidra, O. I., Colmont, M. & Filatov, S. K. (2013). Chem. Rev. 113, 6459–6535. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lazarini, F. (1978). Acta Cryst. B34, 3169–3173. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lazarini, F. (1979a). Acta Cryst. B35, 448–450. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lazarini, F. (1979b). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 8, 69–74. CAS Google Scholar
Lazarini, F. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 1144–1145. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liu, B., Zhou, W., Zhou, Z. & Zhang, X. (2007). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 10, 1145–1148. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Miersch, L., Rüffer, T., Schlesinger, M., Lang, H. & Mehring, M. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 9376–9384. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Missen, O. P., Mills, S. J., Rumsey, M. S., Weil, M., Artner, W., Spratt, J. & Najorka, J. (2022). Phys. Chem. Miner. 49, 21. CrossRef Google Scholar
Müller, U. (2013). Symmetry Relationships between Crystal Structures: Applications of Crystallographic Group Theory in Crystal Chemistry, International Union of Crystallography Texts on Crystallography. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Nørlund Christensen, A. & Lebech, B. (2012). Dalton Trans. 41, 1971–1980. PubMed Google Scholar
Nørlund Christensen, A., Chevallier, M.-A., Skibsted, J. & Iversen, B. B. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 265–270. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sundvall, B. (1979). Acta Chem. Scand. 33a, 219–224. CrossRef Google Scholar
Weil, M., Häusler, T., Bonneau, B. & Füglein, E. (2023). Inorganics, 11, 433. CrossRef Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar