research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Crystal structure of Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 in the structural evolution of niobium oxychlorides with octa­hedral Nb6-cluster units

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemistry, Medan State University, Medan 20221, Indonesia, bDepartment of Chemistry Education, Sriwijaya University, Inderalaya, Ogan Ilir 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia, cStudy Program of Environmental Science, Postgraduate Program, Sriwijaya University, Palembang 30139, South Sumatra, Indonesia, and dInstitut de Chimie de Rennes, Laboratoire de Chimie du Solide et Inorganique Moleculaire, UMR 6511, CNRS-Université de Rennes 1, Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France
*Correspondence e-mail: fgulo@unsri.ac.id

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 21 August 2023; accepted 4 October 2023; online 10 October 2023)

Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3, dicaesium gadolinium hexa­niobium penta­deca­chloride trioxide, was synthesized by solid-state reactions starting from a stoichiometric mixture of CsCl, Gd2O3, Nb, NbCl5, and Nb2O5. The crystal structure is based on octa­hedral Nb6 cluster units (point group symmetry 3.2) with composition [(Nb6Cli9Oi3)Cla6]5– where i and a denote inner and outer ligands. Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 exhibits 14 valence electrons per cluster unit. The cluster units are linked to each other by CsI and GdIII atoms, whereby CsI (site symmetry 3..) is 12-coordinated by six Cli and six Cla ligands belonging to six neighboring cluster units and GdIII (site symmetry 3.2) is 9-coordinated by three Oi and six Cli ligands belonging to three adjacent cluster units. The arrangement of cluster units corresponds to a stacking of …AAA… layers along [001]. Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 is isotypic with Cs2UNb6Cl15O3.

1. Chemical context

Transition-metal clusters have high potentials and synergetic effects in the fields of biotechnology, catalysis, or sensor applications (Nguyen et al., 2022[Nguyen, N. T. K., Lebastard, C., Wilmet, M., Dumait, N., Renaud, A., Cordier, S., Ohashi, N., Uchikoshi, T. & Grasset, F. (2022). Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 23, 547-578.]). The use of these clusters as supra­molecular building units is advantageous because of their unique structural, chemical and physical properties (Zhou & Lachgar, 2007[Zhou, H. & Lachgar, A. (2007). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1053-1066.]). For example, charge-transfer (CT) solids with an anti-perovskite crystal structure have been derived from molybdenum cluster units by electro-crystallization (Hiramatsu et al., 2015[Hiramatsu, T., Yoshida, Y., Saito, G., Otsuka, A., Yamochi, H., Shimizu, Y., Hattori, Y., Nakamura, Y., Kishida, H., Ito, H., Kirakci, K., Cordier, S. & Perrin, C. (2015). J. Mater. Chem. C. 3, 11046-11054.]), or octa­hedral cluster units of niobium have been widely used as raw materials for the preparation of novel compounds with inter­esting structures and magnetic properties (Naumov et al., 2003[Naumov, N. G., Cordier, S., Gulo, F., Roisnel, T., Fedorov, V. E. & Perrin, C. (2003). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 350, 503-510.]; Zhang et al., 2011[Zhang, J.-J., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2011). CrystEngComm, 13, 133-137.]).

A large number of binary, ternary and quaternary niobium compounds with octa­hedral clusters based on the [Nb6Li12La6] unit (L = halogen or oxygen ligands) have been reported previously (Perrin et al., 2001[Perrin, C., Cordier, S., Gulo, F. & Perrin, A. (2001). Ferroelectrics, 254, 83-90.]). In this cluster unit, the edge of the Nb6 octa­hedron is bridged by twelve inner ligands (Li) while the other six outer ligands (La) are located at apical positions (Schäfer & von Schnering, 1964[Schäfer, H. & von Schnering, H. G. (1964). Angew. Chem. 76, 833-849.]). The number of electrons involved in the formation of metal–metal bonds in the cluster is called the valence electron count (VEC). The ideal VEC value per cluster is 16 for chloride compounds and 14 for oxide compounds. In chlorides, the cluster units are inter­linked by involving outer ligands (Perrin, 1997[Perrin, C. (1997). J. Alloys Compd. 262-263, 10-21.]), whereas in oxides, the connectivity between the units is achieved through the inner ligands (Köhler et al., 1991[Köhler, J., Tischtau, R. & Simon, A. (1991). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 829-832.]).

Mixing of halogen and oxygen as ligands for Nb6 cluster compounds is a very inter­esting topic for in-depth studies to enrich our knowledge about new materials and their physical and chemical properties. It has been reported that the structural, magnetic and electronic properties of octa­hedral clusters of niobium oxychlorides are influenced by oxygen ligands (Fontaine et al., 2011[Fontaine, B., Cordier, S., Gautier, R., Gulo, F., Halet, J.-F., Perić, B. & Perrin, C. (2011). New J. Chem. 35, 2245-2252.]). In this respect, preparation and characterization of new oxychloride compounds with octa­hedral Nb6 clusters were reported by Perrin et al. with one Oi (Cordier et al., 1996[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1996). Mater. Res. Bull. 31, 683-690.]), two Oi (Gulo & Perrin, 2000[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2000). J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1721-1724.]), three Oi (Cordier et al., 1994[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1994). Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 31, 1049-1059.], 1997[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1997). Mater. Res. Bull. 32, 25-33.]; Gulo & Perrin, 2002[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. 163, 325-331.]), and six Oi (Gulo et al., 2001[Gulo, F., Roisnel, T. & Perrin, C. (2001). J. Mater. Chem. 11, 1237-1241.]) ligands per cluster unit. Other oxychloride compounds containing four Oi (Anokhina et al., 1998[Anokhina, E. V., Essig, M. W. & Lachgar, A. (1998). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 522-525.], 2000[Anokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2000). Chem. Commun. pp. 1491-1492.]) and six Oi (Anokhina et al., 2001[Anokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 5072-5076.]) ligands per cluster unit are also known.

The niobium oxychloride compound Cs2UNb6Cl15O3 was synthesized and structurally characterized many years ago (Cordier et al., 1997[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1997). Mater. Res. Bull. 32, 25-33.]). We have now prepared a related compound with composition Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 and have determined its crystal structure where gadolinium occupies the same position as uranium in the previous compound. In the current communication, the crystal structure, inter­atomic distances, and the role of monovalent and trivalent cations in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 are compared with other niobium oxychlorides containing octa­hedral Nb6 clusters.

2. Structural commentary

The structure of Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 is isotypic with Cs2UNb6Cl15O3 and displays the Nb6 octa­hedron as the basic cluster motif. The asymmetric unit comprises seven sites: one Cs (site symmetry 3.., multiplicity 4, Wyckoff letter e), one Gd (3.2, 2 c), one Nb (1, 12 i), one O (..2, 6 h) and three Cl (Cl1: 6 h; Cl2 12 i; Cl3: 12 i). Six symmetry-equivalent niobium atoms build up the octa­hedral cluster (centered at a position with site symmetry 3.2, 2 a). Each niobium atom is surrounded by one oxygen (O) inner-ligand, three chlorine (Cl1 and Cl2) inner-ligands, and one chlorine (Cl3) outer-ligand. Every edge of the Nb6 octa­hedron is bridged by a chlorine or oxygen ligand as inner-ligands, and six other chlorine ligands are attached in apical positions as outer ligands, as shown in Fig. 1[link]. This cluster motif can be written as a developed unit, [(Nb6Cli9Oi3)Cla6]5–.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The [(Nb6Cli9Oi3)Cla6]5– unit in the crystal structure of Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 60% probability level.

The length of the intra­cluster Nb—Nb bonds range from 2.7686 (5) to 3.0317 (5) Å corresponding to the edge bridged by the Oi and Cli ligands, respectively; the average bond length is 2.954 Å. Thus, the Nb6 octa­hedron undergoes distortions as observed in other niobium oxychloride compounds. The Nb—Nb distances in this compound are significantly shorter than those observed in other compounds containing two or fewer Oi ligands but are significantly longer than those observed in compounds containing four or more Oi ligands (Gulo & Perrin, 2012[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2012). Oxyhalogénures à Clusters Triangulaires et Octaédriques de Niobium: Synthèses et Caractérisations. Saarbrücken, Germany: Presses Académiques Francophones.]). In the various oxychloride compounds that have been isolated so far, it seems that an increase in the number of Oi ligands per formula leads to a decrease in the length of intra­cluster Nb—Nb bonds. This difference is due to a stronger steric effect as observed, for example, in PbLu3Nb6Cl15O6 (Gulo et al., 2001[Gulo, F., Roisnel, T. & Perrin, C. (2001). J. Mater. Chem. 11, 1237-1241.]) with six Oi ligands. Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 has three Oi ligands per cluster. They are localized at trans-inner positions relative to the Nb6 cluster, similar to the arrangement of three Oi ligands in Na0.21Nb6Cl10.5O3 where the cluster exhibits point group symmetry 3 (Gulo & Perrin, 2002[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. 163, 325-331.]). In contrast, the three Oi ligands in ScNb6Cl13O3 occupy a cis-inner position relative to the Nb6 octa­hedron to produce a cluster motif with 2 symmetry (Cordier et al., 1994[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1994). Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 31, 1049-1059.]). In the title compound, the Nb6 clusters are arranged in (001) layers with an …AAA… stacking along [001] (Fig. 2[link]).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The …AAA… stacking of the Nb6 clusters in the crystal structure of Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3. Cl and O atoms are omitted for clarity

The Nb—Cli distances vary from 2.4543 (7) Å to 2.4802 (7) Å (average 2.468 Å) while the Nb—Cla bond is longer, 2.5728 (7) Å. In general, the Nb—L (L = O, Cl) bond lengths in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 are not significantly different from that of other niobium oxychloride compounds (Naumov et al., 2003[Naumov, N. G., Cordier, S., Gulo, F., Roisnel, T., Fedorov, V. E. & Perrin, C. (2003). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 350, 503-510.]).

In the crystal structure of Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3, the [(Nb6Cli9Oi3)Cla6]5– units are inter­connected through the CsI and GdIII atoms that are located in between the layers of Nb6 clusters (Fig. 2[link]). The existence of such discrete cluster units or the absence of inter­cluster connectivity has also been observed in PbLu3Nb6Cl15O6 (Gulo et al., 2001[Gulo, F., Roisnel, T. & Perrin, C. (2001). J. Mater. Chem. 11, 1237-1241.]) and Cs2Ti4Nb6Cl18O6 (Anokhina et al., 2001[Anokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 5072-5076.]) where Nb6-clusters likewise are formed by six symmetry-equivalent Nb atoms in contrast to CsNb6Cl12O2 (Gulo & Perrin, 2000[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2000). J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1721-1724.]) where the Nb6-octa­hedron is formed by three different Nb atoms. In the crystal structure of the latter, the the cluster units are linked together via bridging O and Cl ligands.

The GdIII atom in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 has a coordination number of 9, defined by three Oi and six Cla ligands provided by three nearby cluster units (Fig. 3[link]), with bond lengths of Gd—O = 2.322 (3) Å and Gd—Cl = 3.0994 (8) Å. In comparison, in the crystal structure of PbLu3Nb6Cl15O6, the LuIII atom is surrounded by only six ligands, viz. two O and four Cl atoms, defining Lu2Cl2 entities (Gulo et al., 2001[Gulo, F., Roisnel, T. & Perrin, C. (2001). J. Mater. Chem. 11, 1237-1241.]). The Nb6-clusters in PbLu3Nb6Cl15O6 connect to each other via these Lu2Cl2 entities whereby each cluster is surrounded by six Lu2Cl2 entities, and each of them bridging four adjacent clusters via O and Cl ligands. A related motif is found in Ti2Nb6Cl14O4 where TiIII atoms form zigzag chains of edge-sharing [TiCl4O2] octa­hedra (Anokhina et al., 2000[Anokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2000). Chem. Commun. pp. 1491-1492.]). In other cases, the trivalent ions, such as ScIII in ScNb6Cl13O3 (Cordier et al., 1994[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1994). Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 31, 1049-1059.]) or TiIII in Cs2Ti3Nb12Cl27O8 (Anokhina et al., 2000[Anokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2000). Chem. Commun. pp. 1491-1492.]), have a coordination number of five, defined by three O and two Cl ligands. In another case, the GdIII atom in RbGdNb6Cl18 is octa­hedrally surrounded by six Cl ligands from six neighboring cluster units (Gulo et al., 2023[Gulo, F., Silaban, S. & Perrin, C. (2023). J. Chim. Nat. Acta, 11, 46-51.]). In general, in the series of niobium oxychloride compounds containing octa­hedral Nb6 clusters, the crystallographic sites associated with trivalent cations are always fully occupied and are surrounded by Cl and O ligands (Gulo & Perrin, 2012[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2012). Oxyhalogénures à Clusters Triangulaires et Octaédriques de Niobium: Synthèses et Caractérisations. Saarbrücken, Germany: Presses Académiques Francophones.]). Only in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 and the isotypic uranium analogue, the trivalent cation occupy the center of a triangle formed by three adjacent cluster units and are bonded to nine ligands.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The environment of the GdIII atom in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3.

In Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3, the monovalent CsI atom is surrounded by six Nb6 clusters and coordinated by twelve Cl ligands (Fig. 4[link]). The lengths of Cs—Cl bonds range from 3.5074 (8) to 3.9770 (6) Å. A similar environment around Cs is found in CsNb6Cl12O2 with Cs—Cl distances between 3.330 (5) and 3.862 (4) Å (Gulo & Perrin, 2000[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2000). J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1721-1724.]). In contrast, the CsI atom in Cs2LuNb6Cl17O is surrounded by four Nb6-clusters and is bonded to twelve chlorine ligands with Cs—Cl distances in the range 3.567 (1) to 3.619 (1) Å (Cordier et al., 1996[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1996). Mater. Res. Bull. 31, 683-690.]). In RbGdNb6Cl18 with its smaller monovalent cation RbI, the coordination number is likewise 12. Here, the cation is surrounded also by four Nb6 clusters, and the Rb—Cl bond lengths range from 3.471 (1) Å to 3.557 (2) Å with an average of 3.512 Å (Gulo et al., 2023[Gulo, F., Silaban, S. & Perrin, C. (2023). J. Chim. Nat. Acta, 11, 46-51.]). The sites of monovalent cations encountered in the crystal structures of oxychlorides with Nb6 clusters are always surrounded by Cl ligands with the exception of Cs2LuNb6Cl17O where an O atom statistically occupies a site among the twelve inner ligands defining the coordination environment of Cs. On the other hand, the sites associated with the (large) monovalent cation often show partial occupancy. For example, in Na0.21Nb6Cl10.5O3, the corresponding Na site has an occupancy of only 42.6% (Gulo & Perrin, 2002[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. 163, 325-331.]) and the three Cs sites in Cs2Ti4Nb6Cl18O6 have occupancies of 38.1%, 57.0% and 6.9% (Anokhina et al., 2001[Anokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 5072-5076.]).

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
The environment of the CsI atom in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3.

The VEC in Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 is 14 per cluster unit, as observed in most oxide (Köhler et al., 1991[Köhler, J., Tischtau, R. & Simon, A. (1991). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 829-832.]) and oxychloride compounds (Gulo & Perrin, 2012[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2012). Oxyhalogénures à Clusters Triangulaires et Octaédriques de Niobium: Synthèses et Caractérisations. Saarbrücken, Germany: Presses Académiques Francophones.]). The number of Oi ligands per cluster can affect the VEC value. Compounds containing one Oi ligand (Cordier et al., 1996[Cordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1996). Mater. Res. Bull. 31, 683-690.]) or two Oi ligands (Gulo & Perrin, 2000[Gulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2000). J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1721-1724.]) exhibit VEC values of 16 and 15. However, niobium oxychloride compounds containing three or more Oi ligands per cluster unit have always a VEC of 14 per cluster unit.

3. Synthesis and crystallization

Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3 was prepared by solid-state reactions, starting from a stoichiometric mixture of CsCl (Prolabo, purity 99.5%), Gd2O3 (Rhône Poulenc), Nb2O5 (Merck, Optipur), NbCl5 (Ventron, purity 99.998%) and niobium powder (Ventron, purity 99.8%). A total of 300 mg of the mixture was mashed and then loaded in a silica tube under argon atmos­phere in a glove box. The silica tube sample was then sealed under vacuum condition. The sample was heated in a vertical heating furnace at 973 K for two days, followed by slow cooling to room temperature. Brown single crystals with a block-like form suitable for structural determination were obtained this way.

4. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1[link]. The remaining maximum and minimum electron density peaks are located 0.19 Å from Nb and 0.54 Å from Cs, respectively.

Table 1
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3
Mr 1560.28
Crystal system, space group Trigonal, P[\overline{3}]1c
Temperature (K) 293
a, c (Å) 9.1318 (1), 17.1558 (2)
V3) 1238.95 (3)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 9.83
Crystal size (mm) 0.08 × 0.07 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Nonius KappaCCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (DENZO and SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.004, 0.017
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7607, 2020, 1790
Rint 0.026
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.833
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.068, 1.15
No. of reflections 2020
No. of parameters 44
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.38, −1.35
Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999[Nonius (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2014[Brandenburg, K. (2014). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]), and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); cell refinement: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); data reduction: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2014); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

(I) top
Crystal data top
Cs2GdNb6Cl15O3Dx = 4.182 Mg m3
Mr = 1560.28Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Trigonal, P31cCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 9.1318 (1) Åθ = 12–18°
c = 17.1558 (2) ŵ = 9.83 mm1
V = 1238.95 (3) Å3T = 293 K
Z = 2Block, brown
F(000) = 13980.08 × 0.07 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1790 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.026
ω scansθmax = 36.3°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(DENZO and SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
h = 1515
Tmin = 0.004, Tmax = 0.017k = 1212
7607 measured reflectionsl = 2728
2020 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0258P)2 + 3.5848P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.068(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.15Δρmax = 1.38 e Å3
2020 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.35 e Å3
44 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.00259 (19)
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cs0.3333330.6666670.54654 (2)0.02645 (9)
Gd0.6666670.3333330.7500000.01649 (8)
Nb0.19768 (3)0.01608 (3)0.68239 (2)0.01105 (7)
Cl10.21283 (6)0.21283 (6)0.7500000.01643 (17)
Cl20.01675 (8)0.20367 (8)0.58643 (4)0.01569 (12)
Cl30.47649 (9)0.07637 (10)0.61760 (5)0.02252 (15)
O0.3730 (3)0.18650 (17)0.7500000.0142 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cs0.02466 (12)0.02466 (12)0.03002 (19)0.01233 (6)0.0000.000
Gd0.00919 (9)0.00919 (9)0.03108 (19)0.00460 (5)0.0000.000
Nb0.00836 (10)0.00944 (10)0.01540 (12)0.00448 (7)0.00090 (7)0.00034 (7)
Cl10.0149 (3)0.0149 (3)0.0233 (4)0.0103 (3)0.0031 (3)0.0031 (3)
Cl20.0144 (3)0.0143 (3)0.0180 (3)0.0068 (2)0.0007 (2)0.0028 (2)
Cl30.0177 (3)0.0231 (3)0.0298 (4)0.0125 (3)0.0090 (3)0.0033 (3)
O0.0092 (10)0.0139 (9)0.0179 (13)0.0046 (5)0.0000.0004 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cs—Cl3i3.5074 (8)Gd—Cl33.0994 (8)
Cs—Cl3ii3.5074 (8)Gd—Cl3viii3.0994 (8)
Cs—Cl3iii3.5074 (8)Gd—Cl3vii3.0994 (8)
Cs—Cl3iv3.5180 (8)Gd—Cl3ix3.0994 (8)
Cs—Cl3v3.5180 (8)Gd—Cl3x3.0994 (8)
Cs—Cl3vi3.5180 (8)Gd—Cl3iii3.0994 (8)
Cs—Cl2i3.6948 (7)Nb—O1.9593 (19)
Cs—Cl2iii3.6948 (7)Nb—Cl12.4543 (7)
Cs—Cl2ii3.6948 (7)Nb—Cl2ii2.4684 (7)
Cs—Cl1iii3.9770 (6)Nb—Cl22.4802 (7)
Cs—Cl1ii3.9770 (6)Nb—Cl32.5728 (7)
Cs—Cl1i3.9770 (5)Nb—Nbx2.7686 (5)
Gd—O2.322 (3)Nb—Nbxi3.0075 (4)
Gd—Ovii2.322 (3)Nb—Nbii3.0075 (4)
Gd—Oiii2.322 (3)Nb—Nbxii3.0317 (5)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl3ii108.589 (15)Oiii—Gd—Cl3vii80.189 (14)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl3iii108.589 (15)Cl3—Gd—Cl3vii72.21 (2)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl3iii108.589 (15)Cl3viii—Gd—Cl3vii98.06 (3)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl3iv108.89 (2)O—Gd—Cl3ix80.189 (13)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl3iv76.72 (2)Ovii—Gd—Cl3ix60.971 (13)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl3iv137.786 (19)Oiii—Gd—Cl3ix130.969 (15)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl3v76.72 (2)Cl3—Gd—Cl3ix98.06 (3)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl3v137.786 (19)Cl3viii—Gd—Cl3ix72.21 (2)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl3v108.89 (2)Cl3vii—Gd—Cl3ix121.94 (2)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl3v62.55 (2)O—Gd—Cl3x60.971 (13)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl3vi137.786 (19)Ovii—Gd—Cl3x130.969 (14)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl3vi108.89 (2)Oiii—Gd—Cl3x80.189 (14)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl3vi76.72 (2)Cl3—Gd—Cl3x121.94 (3)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl3vi62.55 (2)Cl3viii—Gd—Cl3x72.21 (2)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl3vi62.55 (2)Cl3vii—Gd—Cl3x160.38 (3)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl2i61.822 (15)Cl3ix—Gd—Cl3x72.21 (2)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl2i54.828 (15)O—Gd—Cl3iii80.189 (14)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl2i148.77 (2)Ovii—Gd—Cl3iii130.969 (14)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl2i69.076 (17)Oiii—Gd—Cl3iii60.971 (13)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl2i97.986 (17)Cl3—Gd—Cl3iii72.20 (2)
Cl3vi—Cs—Cl2i131.531 (19)Cl3viii—Gd—Cl3iii121.94 (3)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl2iii54.828 (15)Cl3vii—Gd—Cl3iii72.21 (2)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl2iii148.77 (2)Cl3ix—Gd—Cl3iii160.38 (3)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl2iii61.822 (15)Cl3x—Gd—Cl3iii98.06 (3)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl2iii131.531 (19)O—Nb—Cl191.438 (10)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl2iii69.076 (18)O—Nb—Cl2ii95.39 (2)
Cl3vi—Cs—Cl2iii97.986 (17)Cl1—Nb—Cl2ii165.85 (2)
Cl2i—Cs—Cl2iii116.649 (8)O—Nb—Cl2169.99 (6)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl2ii148.77 (2)Cl1—Nb—Cl285.583 (18)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl2ii61.822 (15)Cl2ii—Nb—Cl285.58 (3)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl2ii54.828 (15)O—Nb—Cl375.97 (6)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl2ii97.986 (17)Cl1—Nb—Cl385.14 (2)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl2ii131.531 (19)Cl2ii—Nb—Cl384.52 (2)
Cl3vi—Cs—Cl2ii69.076 (17)Cl2—Nb—Cl394.24 (3)
Cl2i—Cs—Cl2ii116.649 (8)O—Nb—Nbx45.05 (6)
Cl2iii—Cs—Cl2ii116.649 (8)Cl1—Nb—Nbx94.843 (15)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl1iii62.628 (14)Cl2ii—Nb—Nbx98.75 (2)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl1iii97.912 (19)Cl2—Nb—Nbx144.687 (16)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl1iii53.624 (14)Cl3—Nb—Nbx121.017 (19)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl1iii168.335 (15)O—Nb—Nbxi137.22 (6)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl1iii119.844 (17)Cl1—Nb—Nbxi89.097 (14)
Cl3vi—Cs—Cl1iii129.093 (15)Cl2ii—Nb—Nbxi94.227 (16)
Cl2i—Cs—Cl1iii99.332 (16)Cl2—Nb—Nbxi52.396 (17)
Cl2iii—Cs—Cl1iii51.659 (16)Cl3—Nb—Nbxi146.53 (2)
Cl2ii—Cs—Cl1iii88.306 (13)Nbx—Nb—Nbxi92.291 (4)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl1ii97.912 (19)O—Nb—Nbii94.52 (4)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl1ii53.623 (14)Cl1—Nb—Nbii139.044 (15)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl1ii62.629 (14)Cl2ii—Nb—Nbii52.752 (17)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl1ii129.092 (15)Cl2—Nb—Nbii93.982 (16)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl1ii168.336 (16)Cl3—Nb—Nbii135.56 (2)
Cl3vi—Cs—Cl1ii119.844 (17)Nbx—Nb—Nbii63.159 (10)
Cl2i—Cs—Cl1ii88.305 (13)Nbxi—Nb—Nbii60.0
Cl2iii—Cs—Cl1ii99.332 (16)O—Nb—Nbxii93.78 (4)
Cl2ii—Cs—Cl1ii51.660 (16)Cl1—Nb—Nbxii51.856 (14)
Cl1iii—Cs—Cl1ii49.043 (19)Cl2ii—Nb—Nbxii139.534 (16)
Cl3i—Cs—Cl1i53.623 (14)Cl2—Nb—Nbxii91.888 (19)
Cl3ii—Cs—Cl1i62.629 (15)Cl3—Nb—Nbxii135.895 (19)
Cl3iii—Cs—Cl1i97.912 (19)Nbx—Nb—Nbxii62.269 (11)
Cl3iv—Cs—Cl1i119.843 (17)Nbxi—Nb—Nbxii54.570 (9)
Cl3v—Cs—Cl1i129.092 (15)Nbii—Nb—Nbxii87.296 (5)
Cl3vi—Cs—Cl1i168.336 (16)Nbxii—Cl1—Nb76.29 (3)
Cl2i—Cs—Cl1i51.659 (16)Nbxii—Cl1—Csxiii142.343 (15)
Cl2iii—Cs—Cl1i88.305 (13)Nb—Cl1—Csxiii87.830 (6)
Cl2ii—Cs—Cl1i99.333 (16)Nbxii—Cl1—Csxiv87.831 (6)
Cl1iii—Cs—Cl1i49.043 (19)Nb—Cl1—Csxiv142.343 (15)
Cl1ii—Cs—Cl1i49.043 (19)Csxiii—Cl1—Csxiv122.73 (2)
O—Gd—Ovii120.0Nbxi—Cl2—Nb74.85 (2)
O—Gd—Oiii120.0Nbxi—Cl2—Csxiii146.20 (3)
Ovii—Gd—Oiii120.000 (1)Nb—Cl2—Csxiii94.06 (2)
O—Gd—Cl360.971 (13)Nb—Cl3—Gd88.01 (2)
Ovii—Gd—Cl380.190 (14)Nb—Cl3—Csxiii96.94 (2)
Oiii—Gd—Cl3130.969 (14)Gd—Cl3—Csxiii146.22 (3)
O—Gd—Cl3viii130.969 (14)Nb—Cl3—Csv126.46 (3)
Ovii—Gd—Cl3viii80.189 (14)Gd—Cl3—Csv100.30 (2)
Oiii—Gd—Cl3viii60.971 (13)Csxiii—Cl3—Csv103.28 (2)
Cl3—Gd—Cl3viii160.38 (3)Nbx—O—Nb89.91 (11)
O—Gd—Cl3vii130.969 (15)Nbx—O—Gd135.05 (6)
Ovii—Gd—Cl3vii60.971 (13)Nb—O—Gd135.05 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) y, xy, z; (iii) x+y+1, x+1, z; (iv) y, x+y+1, z+1; (v) x+1, y+1, z+1; (vi) xy, x, z+1; (vii) y+1, xy, z; (viii) y+1, x+1, z+3/2; (ix) x+y+1, y, z+3/2; (x) x, xy, z+3/2; (xi) x+y, x, z; (xii) y, x, z+3/2; (xiii) x, y1, z; (xiv) y+1, x, z+3/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank T. Roisnel, Centre de Diffractométrie de l'Université de Rennes 1, France, for the data collection on the Enraf–Nonius KappaCCD X-ray diffractometer.

Funding information

The authors wish to thank the Research Institute of Sriwijaya University for research funding.

References

First citationAnokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2000). Chem. Commun. pp. 1491–1492.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD Google Scholar
First citationAnokhina, E. V., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2001). Inorg. Chem. 40, 5072–5076.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationAnokhina, E. V., Essig, M. W. & Lachgar, A. (1998). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 522–525.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. (2014). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationCordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1994). Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 31, 1049–1059.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationCordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1996). Mater. Res. Bull. 31, 683–690.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCordier, S., Perrin, C. & Sergent, M. (1997). Mater. Res. Bull. 32, 25–33.  CrossRef ICSD CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationFontaine, B., Cordier, S., Gautier, R., Gulo, F., Halet, J.-F., Perić, B. & Perrin, C. (2011). New J. Chem. 35, 2245–2252.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2000). J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1721–1724.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
First citationGulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. 163, 325–331.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
First citationGulo, F. & Perrin, C. (2012). Oxyhalogénures à Clusters Triangulaires et Octaédriques de Niobium: Synthèses et Caractérisations. Saarbrücken, Germany: Presses Académiques Francophones.  Google Scholar
First citationGulo, F., Roisnel, T. & Perrin, C. (2001). J. Mater. Chem. 11, 1237–1241.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
First citationGulo, F., Silaban, S. & Perrin, C. (2023). J. Chim. Nat. Acta, 11, 46–51.  Google Scholar
First citationHiramatsu, T., Yoshida, Y., Saito, G., Otsuka, A., Yamochi, H., Shimizu, Y., Hattori, Y., Nakamura, Y., Kishida, H., Ito, H., Kirakci, K., Cordier, S. & Perrin, C. (2015). J. Mater. Chem. C. 3, 11046–11054.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKöhler, J., Tischtau, R. & Simon, A. (1991). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 829–832.  Google Scholar
First citationNaumov, N. G., Cordier, S., Gulo, F., Roisnel, T., Fedorov, V. E. & Perrin, C. (2003). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 350, 503–510.  Web of Science CrossRef ICSD CAS Google Scholar
First citationNguyen, N. T. K., Lebastard, C., Wilmet, M., Dumait, N., Renaud, A., Cordier, S., Ohashi, N., Uchikoshi, T. & Grasset, F. (2022). Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 23, 547–578.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationPerrin, C. (1997). J. Alloys Compd. 262–263, 10–21.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationPerrin, C., Cordier, S., Gulo, F. & Perrin, A. (2001). Ferroelectrics, 254, 83–90.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSchäfer, H. & von Schnering, H. G. (1964). Angew. Chem. 76, 833–849.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZhang, J.-J., Day, C. S. & Lachgar, A. (2011). CrystEngComm, 13, 133–137.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationZhou, H. & Lachgar, A. (2007). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1053–1066.  CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds