scientific commentaries\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY

ISSN: 2053-2296

Volume 79| Part 1| January 2023| Pages 1-2

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229622011731

Open  access

Hydrate formation at extreme conditions

Simon Parsons^a*

^aEaStCHEM School of Chemistry and Centre for Science at Extreme Conditions, The University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FJ, United Kingdom
^*Correspondence e-mail: s.parsons@ed.ac.uk

Keywords: salt hydrate; high pressure; intercalation; commentary; potassium chloride.

Similar articles

A search of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database for hydrates of the group I binary halides shows that the most extensive series is formed by lithium, for which mono-, di- and trihydrates are known for the chloride, bromide and iodide. The most highly hydrated species are the penta­hydrates formed by LiCl and LiBr (Sohr et al., 2018). Below lithium, the hydrate chemistry drops off quickly. Sodium chloride, bromide and iodide form only dihydrates, and amongst the heavier elements, only KF·2H₂O (Preisinger et al., 1994), KF·4H₂O (Beurskens & Jeffrey, 1964) and RbF·H₂O (Troyanov, 2005) are known. This series of materials contrasts with the halides of the more highly charged group II metals, which have an extensive hydrate chemistry, including some very highly hydrated examples, such as MgCl₂·12H₂O (Sasvari & Jeffrey, 1966). The propensity towards hydrate formation by lithium can be regarded as an example of a diagonal relationship in the periodic table.

Inter­est in hydrates of simple salts stems from their importance as possible mineral phases on icy planets and moons. While the majority of work has been carried out at ambient pressure, characterizing the behaviour of hydrates at high pressure, yielding data such as bulk moduli, as well as new and perturbed crystal structures, is important for developing geophysical models of extraterrestrial environments (Grindrod et al., 2010; Maynard-Casely, 2017).

In the December issue of Acta Crystallographica Section C, Yamashita et al. (2022) report the crystal structure of a new monohydrate of KCl, obtained at 2.23 GPa by in situ crystal growth from a saturated aqueous solution contained in a diamond anvil cell (Komatsu et al., 2011). The crystal grows together with high-pressure phases of ice, and the authors controlled the crystallization conditions to ensure that the concomitant phase was ice-VII, which is cubic with a ∼ 3.3 Å, rather than the more complex ice-VI, which led to greater contamination of the diffraction pattern. The novel design of the diamond anvil cell (which is described in more detail in the supporting information) had an unusually large opening angle to optimize data completeness.

KCl itself crystallizes in the NaCl structure (also called `B1') under ambient conditions, but in the CsCl structure (`B2') above 2 GPa, the higher coordination numbers of the ions enable a more efficient packing even if the bond distances are slightly longer, an example of what Kleber has termed the pressure–distance paradox (Müller, 2006). The structure of KCl·H₂O can be considered to have some of the characteristics of both phases. The first impression is of the NaCl structure which has become distorted to accommodate the water, but the potassium is eight-coordinate, as in the CsCl-like phase. The positions of the H atoms, which are very important for understanding the crystal structures of hydrates, were located from the diffraction data and confirmed using periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

Although chemically simple, the salt hydrates are very sensitive to external conditions, with complex energy landscapes containing multiple viable phases. However, transformations between solid phases are frequently kinetically hindered, and KCl·H₂O is not accessible by, for example, compressing solid KCl in the presence of water. The article of Yamashita et al. illustrates the ability of in situ crystal growth to bypass kinetic barriers between phases, demonstrating the importance of this approach in phase discovery (Oswald et al., 2008; Ridout & Probert, 2013; Moggach & Oswald, 2020).